Cited by 15Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMedicine, History, and Philosophy

A spiritual problem? Primary care physicians' and psychiatrists' interpretations of medically unexplained symptoms

Open access
Shin, Jiwon Helen, Yoon, John D., Rasinski, Kenneth A., Koenig, Harold G., Meador, Keith G., Curlin, Farr A.·2013·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Patients commonly present to their physicians with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), and there is no consensus about how physicians should interpret or treat such symptoms.Objective To examine how variations in physicians' interpretations of MUS are associated with physicians' religious characteristics and with physician specialty (primary care vs. psychiatry).Design and participants A national survey of a stratified random sample of 1,504 primary care physicians and 512 psychiatrists in 2009-2010.Main measures The extent to which physicians believe MUS reflect a root problem that is spiritual in nature or result from conditions that scientific research will eventually explain, and whether such patients would benefit from attention to their relationships, attention to their spiritual life, taking medications, and/or treatment by physicians.Key results Response rate was 63 % (1,208/1,909). More religious/spiritual physicians were more likely to believe that MUS reflect a spiritual problem (55 % for high vs. 24 % for low spirituality; OR = 2.8, 1.7-4.5) and that these patients would benefit from paying attention to their spiritual life (79 % for high vs. 55 % for low spirituality; OR = 3.1, 1.8-5.3). Psychiatrists were more likely to believe that scientific research will one day explain MUS (66 % vs. 52 %; OR = 1.9, 1.4-2.5) and that these symptoms will improve with treatment by a physician (54 % vs. 35 %; OR = 2.4, 1.8-3.3). They were less likely to believe that MUS reflect a spiritual problem (23 % vs. 38 %; OR = 0.5, 0.4-0.8).Conclusions Physicians' interpretations of MUS vary widely, depending in part on physicians' religious characteristics and specialty. One in three physicians believes that patients with MUS have root problems that are spiritual in nature. Physicians who are more religious or spiritual are more likely to think of MUS as stemming from spiritual concerns. Psychiatrists are more optimistic that these patients will get better with treatment by physicians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-012-2224-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wolfe F. Fibromyalgia wars. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(4):671-8.
  2. Sykes R. Medically unexplained symptoms and the siren "Psychogenic inference." Philos Psychiatr Psychol. 2010;17(4):289-99. Available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/ . Accessed July 30, 2012.

Authors
Shin, J. H., Yoon, J. D., Rasinski, K. A., Koenig, H. G., Meador, K. G., & Curlin, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Westminster Seminary California (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Curlin, Farr A.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2012-10-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
392-398
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2085465291
Cited by
15
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT002749)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
medically unexplained symptoms, physician beliefs, spirituality, primary care physicians, psychiatrists, physician specialty differences, treatment expectations
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Somatoform Disorders, United States, Spirituality, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review