Use of Stakeholder focus groups to define the mission and scope of a new department of population health
Open accessAbstract
Background The focus and funding of US healthcare is evolving from volume to value-based, and healthcare leaders, managers, payers, and researchers are increasingly focusing on managing populations of patients. Simultaneously, there is increasing interest in getting "upstream" from disease management to promote health and prevent disease. Hence, the term "population health" has both clinical and community-based connotations relevant to the tripartite mission of US medical schools.Objective To seek broad input for the strategic development of the Department of Population Health in a new medical school at a tier 1 research university.Design Focus groups with facilitated consensus development.Participants Eighty-one persons representing the Dell Medical School and other schools at the University of Texas at Austin, city/county government, community nonprofit organizations, and faculty from other local university schools along with selected national academic leaders.Approach Focus groups with subsequent consensus development of emphases identified premeeting by participants by e-mail exchanges.Key results The resulting departmental strategic plan included scope of work, desired characteristics of leaders, and early impact activities in seven areas of interest: community engagement and health equity, primary care and value-based health, occupational and environment medicine, medical education, health services and community-based research, health informatics and data analysis, and global health.Conclusions Medical schools should have a primary focus in population, most effectively at the departmental level. Engaging relevant academic and community stakeholders is an effective model for developing this emerging discipline in US medical schools.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One medical school sought input for the strategic development of the department of population health in a new medical school through focus groups.
“One medical school sought input for the strategic development of the department of population health in a new medical school through focus groups.69”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Tierney, W. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tierney, William M.
- ORCID
- Tierney, William M.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1069-1076
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC6025682
- OpenAlex
- W2797714726
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin
- Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- population health, medical school departments, stakeholder engagement, strategic planning, value-based care, community participation, health equity, primary care, occupational and environmental medicine, medical education, health services research, health informatics, global health, academic medical centers
- MeSH terms
- Stakeholder Participation, Population Health, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Medical, Texas, Focus Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review