Professional Development Coaching for Residents: Results of a 3-Year Positive Psychology Coaching Intervention
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Being outside of specialty is a factor in coach selection.
“| Coach selection | Outside of specialty | [63,147,156] | |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [147]
Self-selection/voluntary participation is a factor in coach selection.
“| Coach selection | Self-selected/voluntary | [93,96,147] | |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [147]
Relationship skills are a program outcome.
“| Coaching outcomes | Program | Relationship skills | [62,123,147] |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [147]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Perlo J, Balik B, Swensen S, Kabcenell A, Landsman J, Feeley D. IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work. IHI White Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2017.
- Maslach C, Schaufeli W, Leiter M. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52(1), 397-422.
- Authors
- Palamara, K., Kauffman, C., Chang, Y., Barreto, E. A., Yu, L., Bazari, H., & Donelan, K.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palamara, Kerri
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2018-07-23
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1842-1844
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC6206332
- OpenAlex
- W2884933053
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arthur Vining Davis Foundations
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- positive psychology coaching, medical residents, burnout, emotional exhaustion, coping strategies, resilience, goal setting, reflection, coach communication, leadership development, emotional intelligence, authentic leadership, physician well-being, Maslach Burnout Inventory
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Clinical Competence, Humans, Internship and Residency, Job Satisfaction, Time Factors, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
