The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Americans’ COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines
Open accessAbstract
Importance Documenting Americans' stress responses to an unprecedented pandemic and their degree of adherence to CDC guidelines is essential for mental health interventions and policy-making.Objective To provide the first snapshot of immediate impact of COVID-19 on Americans' stress, coping, and guideline adherence.Design Data were collected from an online workers' platform for survey research (Amazon's Mechanical Turk) from April 7 to 9, 2020. The current data represents the baseline of a longitudinal study. Best practices for ensuring high-quality data were employed.Participants Individuals who are 18 years of age or older, living in the USA, and English-speaking were eligible for the study. Of 1086 unique responses, 1015 completed responses are included.Setting Population-based.Main outcomes Exposure to and stressfulness of COVID-19 stressors, coping strategies, and adherence to CDC guidelines.Results The sample was 53.9% women (n = 547), with an average age of 38.9 years (SD = 13.50, range = 18-88), most of whom were White (n = 836, 82.4%), non-Hispanic (n = 929, 91.5%), and straight/heterosexual (n = 895, 88.2%); 40% were currently married (n = 407), and 21.6% (n = 219) were caregivers. About half (50.5%) endorsed having at least "mostly" enough money to meet their needs. Respondents' locations across the USA ranged from 18.5% in the Northeast to 37.8% in the South. The most commonly experienced stressors were reading/hearing about the severity and contagiousness of COVID-19, uncertainty about length of quarantine and social distancing requirements, and changes to social and daily personal care routines. Financial concerns were rated most stressful. Younger age, female gender, and caregiver status increased risk for stressor exposure and greater degree of stressfulness. The most frequently reported strategies to manage stress were distraction, active coping, and seeking emotional social support. CDC guideline adherence was generally high, but several key social distancing and hygiene behaviors showed suboptimal adherence, particularly for men and younger adults.Conclusions and relevance Americans have high COVID-19 stress exposure and some demographic subgroups appear particularly vulnerable to stress effects. Subgroups less likely to adhere to CDC guidelines may benefit from targeted information campaigns. these findings may guide mental health interventions and inform policy-making regarding implications of specific public health measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research conducted during the initial lockdown period found that American adults commonly dealt with stress through distraction, active coping, and seeking emotional support [31]”
From Gender Differences in Coping and Psychological Adaptation during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3532534 · Cited by 16,394
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378 · cited 1×
“Time-sensitive research has identified diverse stressors in previous geographically limited quarantines, including fears of infection, disruptions to work/learning, and daily self-care routines, in addition to lack of access to reliable information and resources.(2) However, little is known about these stressors in th…”
BackgroundWang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729 · Cited by 9,923
You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope
Carver, C. S. (1997) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6 · Cited by 7,361
Qiu, J., Shen, B., Zhao, M., Wang, Z., Xie, B., & Xu, Y. (2020) · General Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213 · Cited by 4,307 · cited 1×
“D.(3), Lucy Finkelstein-Fox, MS(1), Morica Hutchison, MFT(2), and Jessica Becker, MSW(3)”
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Galea, S., Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562 · Cited by 2,089 · cited 1×
“Based on responses to previous disasters, expectations are of substantial long-term mental health problems.(27) These data, collected as the COVID-19 pandemic was gaining steam nationally, underscore the need for more resources to help individuals create healthy and safe coping responses as the virus continues to spre…”
BackgroundZhang, Y., & Ma, Z. F. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17072381 · Cited by 1,477
Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168015604648 · Cited by 903
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hitlin, H. Research in the crowdsourcing age, a case study: How scholars, companies and workers are using Mechanical Turk, a ‘gig economy’ platform, for tasks computers can’t handle. Pew Research Center, July 2016. (http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/research-in-the-crowdsourcing-age-a-case-study/).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–726 of 726
How lockdown changed the sex lives of young adults – new research
Wignall, L., & McCormack, M. (2021) · doi:10.64628/ab.csn953he3
Chakrabarty, A., Dinh, J., Deitch, R., Carr, N., Lane, H., & Hager, E. R. (2025) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171251379443
Lac, A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73363-5_84
Piness, J., & Harger, B. (2025) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.70040
Lotzin, A., Ketelsen, R., Novaković, I. Z., Lueger‐Schuster, B., Böttche, M., & Schäfer, I. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19565841
Castonguay, F. M., Barnes, A., Jeon, S., Fornoff, J., Adhikari, B. B., Fischer, L. S., Greening, B., Hassan, A. O., Kahn, E. B., Kang, G. J., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25596387
Leigh, J. P., Brundin‐Mather, R., Soo, A., FitzGerald, E. A., Mizen, S. J., Dodds, A., Ahmed, S., Burns, K. E. A., Plotnikoff, K. M., Rochwerg, B. N., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19572579
Crandall, A. K., Madhudi, N., Osborne, B., Carter, A., Williams, A. K., & Temple, J. L. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20521650
Leigh, J. P., Brundin‐Mather, R., Soo, A., FitzGerald, E. A., Mizen, S. J., Dodds, A., Ahmed, S., Burns, K. E. A., Plotnikoff, K. M., Rochwerg, B. N., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19572573
Leigh, J. P., Brundin‐Mather, R., Soo, A., FitzGerald, E. A., Mizen, S. J., Dodds, A., Ahmed, S., Burns, K. E. A., Plotnikoff, K. M., Rochwerg, B. N., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19572585
Pichonnaz, C., & Foley, R.-A. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23983370
Gbeinda, S. (2025) · World Journal of Public Health · doi:10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.24
Cıranoğlu, M. (2025) · Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.30798/makuiibf.1563562
“According to Park et al. (2020), during the COVID-19 period, humor and both internal and external organizational support (including understanding encountered in social life) played a decisive role in coping behaviors and influenced the implementation of societal guidelines.”
Pearman, A. M., Hughes, M., Smith, E. L., & Neupert, S. D. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113642
Swanson, L. M., Bommarito, S., Kile, K., Warren, R., Montalva, R., Bullard, K. H., McCabe, V. V., Patel, P. D., & Dalack, G. W. (2026) · International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1080/13651501.2026.2620996
“…et al. 2023) but also profoundly disrupted daily life, inten-sifying stress through altered routines, social isolation, and persistent uncertainty (Park et al. 2020). historically, large-scale crises are associated with increased mental health symptoms and psychiatric disorder rates (Beaglehole…”
Parlak, E. A., Ayhan, H., & İyigün, E. (2025) · Sağlık akademisyenleri dergisi/Sağlık akademisyenler dergisi · doi:10.52880/sagakaderg.1662119
Wandinger, E., Brindle, A., Nees, F., & Reis, O. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1753885
Predicting resilience among health social workers during COVID-19
Olson, L., Robinson, A., Cabrera, A., Bickel, J., Eigege, C. Y., Blanchard, K., Bailey, B. L., Mandiberg, J. M., & Gearing, R. E. (2026) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053261423629
“Empathy among health social workers has been a focal point in research addressing the challenges of providing compassionate care in a crisis (Park et al., 2020; Sinclair et al., 2017; Su et al., 2024).”
McCarthy, K. J., Aronson, K. R., Mitchell, M. M., & Perkins, D. F. (2026) · Chronic Stress · doi:10.1177/24705470261432617
Enduring versus curable: mixed-methods perspectives about pain among chiropractic patients
Whitley, M. D., Maiers, M., Hilton, L. G., Wexler, R. S., Coulter, I. D., Iyiewuare, P. O., & Ryan, G. W. (2026) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2026.102689 · Cited by 1
Mogwitz, S., Körber, J., Jerg‐Bretzke, L., Albus, C., Baranowski, A., Beschoner, P., Erim, Y., Geiser, F., Morawa, E., Steudte‐Schmiedgen, S., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1782679
Peterson, L. M., DiMuccio, S. H., Helweg‐Larsen, M., & Lin, J. A. (2026) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaag039
Zhu, K., Barberio, J., Tsao, N., Mor, A., Harikrishnan, V., Li, X., & Sinnott, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0355103
“Besides, adverse psychological consequences during the COVID-19 [52,53] may have an impact on the risk of common stress ‐ responsive skin conditions, such as AD [54,55].”
Wang, Y., Prybutok, G. T., Gulzari, A., Peng, X., Prybutok, V. R., Lu, Y., & Cheng, F. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10819-y
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. L., Russell, B. S., Fendrich, M., Finkelstein-Fox, L., Hutchison, M., & Becker, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Crystal L.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2020-05-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2296-2303
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC7259430
- OpenAlex
- W3031875368
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 49
- FWCI
- 61.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R34AA027455)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, psychological stress, coping strategies, social distancing, hygiene practices, financial stress, caregiver burden, gender differences, age differences, social support, mental health
- MeSH terms
- Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Public Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Guidelines as Topic, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Guideline Adherence, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
