Hypoglycemia communication in primary care visits for patients with diabetes
Open accessAbstract
Background Hypoglycemia is a common and serious adverse effect of diabetes treatment, especially for patients using insulin or insulin secretagogues. Guidelines recommend that these patients be assessed for interval hypoglycemic events at each clinical encounter and be provided anticipatory guidance for hypoglycemia prevention.Objective To determine the frequency and content of hypoglycemia communication in primary care visits.Design Qualitative study PARTICIPANTS: We examined 83 primary care visits from one urban health practice representing 8 clinicians and 33 patients using insulin or insulin secretagogues.Approach Using a directed content analysis approach, we analyzed audio-recorded primary care visits collected as part of the Achieving Blood Pressure Control Together study, a randomized trial of behavioral interventions for hypertension. The coding framework included communication about interval hypoglycemia, defined as discussion of hypoglycemic events or symptoms; the components of hypoglycemia anticipatory guidance in diabetes guidelines; and hypoglycemia unawareness. Hypoglycemia documentation in visit notes was compared to visit transcripts.Key results Communication about interval hypoglycemia occurred in 24% of visits, and hypoglycemic events were reported in 16%. Despite patients voicing fear of hypoglycemia, clinicians rarely assessed hypoglycemia frequency, severity, or its impact on quality of life. Hypoglycemia anticipatory guidance was provided in 21% of visits which focused on diet and behavior change; clinicians rarely counseled on hypoglycemia treatment or avoidance of driving. Limited discussions of hypoglycemia unawareness occurred in 8% of visits. Documentation in visit notes had low sensitivity but high specificity for ascertaining interval hypoglycemia communication or hypoglycemic events, compared to visit transcripts.Conclusions In this high hypoglycemia risk population, communication about interval hypoglycemia and counseling for hypoglycemia prevention occurred in a minority of visits. There is a need to support clinicians to more regularly assess their patients' hypoglycemia burden and enhance counseling practices in order to optimize hypoglycemia prevention in primary care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals may treat normal glucose values as hypoglycemic.
“It is essential to correlate glucose readings, both from glucose meters and CGM systems, with symptoms and treatment, as individuals may experience and treat hypoglycemic symptoms without checking their glucose level (107), treat normal glucose values as hypoglycemic, or tolerate hypoglycemia without treatment either because of lack of symptoms or to avoid hyperglycemia.”
From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
In “Communication About Interval Hypoglycemia: Frequency and Content” (page not available), the paper reports four visits in which patients worried that normal glucose readings were too low; one patient called a reading of 96 “low.” This supports mistaking a normal value for hypoglycemia, but the passage does not say those patients treated the readings as hypoglycemic episodes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIndividuals may experience and treat hypoglycemic symptoms without checking their glucose level.
“It is essential to correlate glucose readings, both from glucose meters and CGM systems, with symptoms and treatment, as individuals may experience and treat hypoglycemic symptoms without checking their glucose level (107), treat normal glucose values as hypoglycemic, or tolerate hypoglycemia without treatment either because of lack of symptoms or to avoid hyperglycemia.”
From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
In the discussion (section 12; page not provided), the paper says that reviewing glucose readings alone is likely to miss hypoglycemic events because adherence to self-monitoring is low. This supports the possibility of events without a recorded glucose reading, but it does not establish that patients experienced symptoms and treated them without checking their glucose at the time. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIndividuals may tolerate hypoglycemia without treatment either because of lack of symptoms or to avoid hyperglycemia.
“It is essential to correlate glucose readings, both from glucose meters and CGM systems, with symptoms and treatment, as individuals may experience and treat hypoglycemic symptoms without checking their glucose level (107), treat normal glucose values as hypoglycemic, or tolerate hypoglycemia without treatment either because of lack of symptoms or to avoid hyperglycemia.”
From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
The Introduction (page not provided) describes hypoglycemia unawareness: a person may have low blood glucose without autonomic symptoms. The paper does not say that people leave hypoglycemia untreated because they lack symptoms or because they want to avoid hyperglycemia. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Pilla, S. J., Park, J., Schwartz, J. L., Albert, M. C., Ephraim, P. L., Boulware, L. E., Mathioudakis, N. N., Maruthur, N. M., Beach, M. C., & Greer, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pilla, Scott J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2021-01-21
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1533-1542
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC8175615
- OpenAlex
- W3122491022
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University (KL2TR003099)
- University of Rochester
- Rush University
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR003099)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL105187)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- hypoglycemia, diabetes mellitus, primary care, patient-clinician communication, hypoglycemia prevention, hypoglycemia unawareness, insulin, insulin secretagogues, clinical guideline adherence
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review