Incidence and Predictors of Primary Nonadherence to Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Agonists in a Large Integrated Healthcare System
Open accessAbstract
Background Newer glucose-lowering drugs, including sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and GLP-1 agonists, have a key role in the pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes. No studies have measured primary nonadherence for these two drug classes, defined as when a medication is prescribed for a patient but ultimately not dispensed to them.Objective To describe the incidence and predictors of primary nonadherence to SGLT2i (canagliflozin, empagliflozin) or GLP-1 agonists (dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide) using a dataset that links electronic prescribing with health insurance claims.Design and participants A retrospective cohort design using data of adult patients from a large health system who had at least one prescription order for a SGLT2i or GLP-1 agonist between 2012 and 2019. We used mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between sociodemographic, clinical, and provider variables and primary nonadherence.Main measures Primary medication nonadherence, defined as no dispensed claim within 30 days of an electronic prescription order for any drug within each medication class.Key results The cohort included 5146 patients newly prescribed a SGLT2i or GLP-1 agonist. The overall incidence of 30-day primary medication nonadherence was 31.8% (1637/5146). This incidence rate was 29.8% (n = 726) and 33.6% (n = 911) among those initiating a GLP-1 agonist and SGLT2i, respectively. Age ≥ 65 (aOR 1.37 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.72)), Black race vs White (aOR 1.29 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.62)), diabetic nephropathy (aOR 1.31 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.68)), and hyperlipidemia (aOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.39)) were associated with a higher odds of primary nonadherence. Female sex (aOR 0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.99)), peripheral artery disease (aOR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.94)), and having the index prescription ordered by an endocrinologist vs a primary care provider (aOR 0.76 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.95)) were associated with lower odds of primary nonadherence.Conclusions One third of patients prescribed SGLT2i or GLP-1 agonists in this sample did not fill their prescription within 30 days. Black race, male sex, older age, having greater baseline comorbidities, and having a primary care provider vs endocrinologist prescribe the index drug were associated with higher odds of primary nonadherence. Interventions targeting medication adherence for these newer drugs must consider primary nonadherence as a barrier to optimal clinical care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medication nonadherence to GLP-1 RA medications has been reported.
“Although these medications have shown encouraging health outcomes, medication nonadherence has been reported.9,10”
From Differences in GLP-1 RA medication adherence across place-based variables in patients with diabetes living in Wisconsin (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In prior work from a large integrated health system, one third of patients newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist did not fill their prescription within 30 days.
“In prior work from a large integrated health system, we showed that one third of patients newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 RA did not fill their prescription within 30 days.15”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Luo, J., Feldman, R., Rothenberger, S., Korytkowski, M., Fischer, M. A., & Gellad, W. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Luo, Jing
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2022-01-19
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3562-3569
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC9585108
- OpenAlex
- W4205711498
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases (K23DK120956)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001856)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- medication non-adherence, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin, empagliflozin, dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide, predictors of non-adherence, diabetic nephropathy, hyperlipidemia, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Canagliflozin, Liraglutide, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Retrospective Studies, Sodium, Incidence, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Symporters, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review