The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Association of Racial and Ethnic Concordance in Primary Care with Patient Satisfaction and Experience of Care
Open accessAbstract
Background The lack of racial and ethnic concordance between patients and their physicians may contribute to American health disparities.Objective To examine the level of racial and ethnic concordance for patients and primary care clinicians and its association with measures of patient experience.Design Multivariate cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative data.Participants Adults 18 to 64 in the 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey who had at least one medical visit in the past year.Main measures Key independent variables include having a racially/ethnically concordant primary care clinician, lacking a usual source of care, and having a usual source that is a place rather than a person. Outcomes include overall satisfaction with health care, number of medical visits, having enough time in care, ease of understanding the clinician, and receiving respect.Key results The comparison between the actual level of concordance with an expected distribution if all patients had the same probability of having a clinician of a given race or type indicates that Black, Latino, and Asian patients are three or more times as likely to have a concordant clinician than expected, suggesting a strong preference for clinicians of the same race or ethnicity. Racial or ethnic concordance has a modest positive association with overall health care satisfaction and respect but is not significantly associated with the number of medical visits or other outcomes. Poor health status, being uninsured, and lacking a usual source of care are more strongly associated with patient experience.Discussion Efforts to increase the diversity of the primary care workforce could increase racial/ethnic concordance but may have only modest effects on patients' experience of care. Policies like lowering the number of uninsured or increasing those with a usual source of care may be more salient in improving experience of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies on patient-clinician racial/ethnic or gender concordance have shown mixed or inconclusive results.
“Findings from these studies are varied: some suggest that patient-clinician racial/ethnic or gender concordance offers benefits [7-11], while others do not [12-14]. Moreover, a recent systematic review studying the association between racial, gender, and multifactorial concordance reported inconclusive results on patient outcomes, advocating for further research [15].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Ku, L., & Vichare, A.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ku, Leighton
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2022-06-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 727-732
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC9186269
- OpenAlex
- W4281936981
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- patient satisfaction, patient experience, usual source of care, primary care, health disparities, Black patients, Hispanic patients, Asian patients, uninsured status, respect in care, time in care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Status, Humans, Physicians, Primary Health Care, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review