The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Primary Care Physicians’ Electronic Inbox Activity Patterns with Patients’ Likelihood to Recommend the Physician
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Administrative tasks, including reviewing and responding to EHR inbox messages from patients, are often time consuming and not reimbursable, and have been linked to clinician burnout, 33 especially among female providers.”
From Wearable Devices, Health Care Use, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinician ambulatory electronic health record use
Holmgren, A. J., Downing, N. L., Tang, M., Sharp, C., Longhurst, C., & Huckman, R. S. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab268 · Cited by 182
Gendered Expectations: Do They Contribute to High Burnout Among Female Physicians?
Linzer, M., & Harwood, E. M. (2018) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4330-0 · Cited by 162
Primary Care Physician Gender and Electronic Health Record Workload
Rittenberg, E., Liebman, J. B., & Rexrode, K. M. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07298-z · Cited by 124
Rotenstein, L. S., Fong, A., Jeffery, M. M., Sinsky, C. A., Goldstein, R. L., Williams, B., & Melnick, E. R. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3935 · Cited by 73
Self-citationRotenstein, L. S., Harry, E. M., Wickner, P. G., Gupte, A., Neville, B. A., Lipsitz, S. R., Cullen, E., Rozenblum, R., Sequist, T. D., & Dudley, J. C. (2021) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.08.002 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wearable Devices, Health Care Use, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Rosman, L., Lampert, R., Zhuo, S., Li, Q., Varma, N., Burg, M., Gaffey, A. E., Armbruster, T., & Gehi, A. (2024) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.123.033750 · Cited by 73
“34 Thus, additional research is needed to understand the downstream effects of wearables on providers, clinic workflow, and health care systems.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotenstein, L. S., Melnick, E. R., Jeffery, M., Zhang, J., Sinsky, C. A., Gitomer, R., & Bates, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- American Medical Association (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rotenstein, Lisa S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2023-09-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-152
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC10817856
- OpenAlex
- W4386881775
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Medical Association (contract number 19450)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- primary care physicians, physician-patient communication, patient satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Primary Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
