The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amend Notes as the Next Frontier of the OpenNotes Initiative
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2121 · Cited by 972
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(7):461-470. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002. · DOI · Paper page
- Walker J, Leveille S, Kriegel G, et al. Patients Contributing to Visit Notes: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Ournotes. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):1-13. https://doi.org/10.2196/29951. · DOI
- DesRoches CM, Bell SK, Dong Z, et al. Patients Managing Medications and Reading their Visit Notes: A Survey of OpenNotes Participants. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(1):69-71. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3197. · DOI
- Sun M, Oliwa T, Peek ME, Tung EL. Negative Patient Descriptors: Documenting Racial Bias in the Electronic Health Record. Health Aff. 2022;41(2):203-211. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423. · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, G., & Zabinski, J.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2024-06-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2578-2580
- ISSN
- 0884-8734
- 1525-1497
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amend Notes as the Next Frontier of the OpenNotes Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11606-024-08904-6
- The paper
- Holt, G., & Zabinski, J. (2024). Amend Notes as the Next Frontier of the OpenNotes Initiative. Journal of General Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08904-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
