The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 192
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [8]8. Cook PJ (2014) Interactive comment on ''Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources'' by J. D. Edixhoven et al. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 4:C683-C685
- [16]16. Gu ¨nther S (2004) Sustainable tourism development on La Digue Island, Republic of Seychelles. Transdisciplinary methods for sustainable solutions in a tropical paradise. Unpublished Diploma Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich
- [17]17. Habermas J (1996) Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (trans: Regh W). MIT Press, Cambridge
- [18]18. Hilton J (2014) Interactive comment on ''Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources'' by J. D. Edixhoven et al. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 4:EC686-EC686
- [39]39. Haverkort B, Reijntjes C (eds) Moving Worldviews-Reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development, COMPAS Editions, vol 142-166, pp 142-166
- [54]54. Scholz RW, Stauffacher M (2009) From a science for society to a science with society. Psychologische Rundschau 60(4):242- U280
- Authors
- Scholz, R. W., & Steiner, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Scholz, Roland W.
- Venue
- Sustainability Science
- Published
- 2015-08-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 653-671
- ISSN
- 1862-4057 (ISSN-L)
- 1862-4065
- OpenAlex
- W1681017331
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 30.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sustainability Science (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Keywords
- transdisciplinary research, knowledge integration, sustainability transitions, consensus building, legitimation, interdisciplinary research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
