Cited by 11

Best practices for naming, receiving, and managing cells in culture

Reid, Yvonne A.·2017·In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal

Abstract

One of the first considerations in using an existing cell line or establishing a new a cell line is the detailed proactive planning of all phases of the cell line management. It is necessary to have a well-trained practitioner in best practices in cell culture who has experience in receiving a new cell line into the laboratory, the correct and appropriate use of a cell line name, the preparation of cell banks, microscopic observation of cells in culture, growth optimization, cell count, cell subcultivation, as well as detailed protocols on how to expand and store cells. Indeed, the practitioner should best manage all activities of cell culture by ensuring that the appropriate certified facilities, equipment, and validated supplies and reagents are in place.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11626-017-0199-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no universally accepted naming convention for all cell lines, but some fields, such as PSCs, have published standards to systematically create unique cell line identifiers.

    “Although there is no universally accepted naming convention for all cell lines, some fields, such as PSCs, have published standards to systematically create unique cell line identifiers (Kurtz et al., 2018; Reid, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reid, Y. A.
Venue
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
Published
2017-10
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
761-774
ISSN
  • 1071-2690
  • 1543-706X
Cited by
11
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review