Cited by 30Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 232 of the 235 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Pre-training in Medical Data: A Survey

Open access
Qiu, Yixuan, Lin, Feng, Chen, Weitong, Xu, Miao·2023·Machine Intelligence Research

Abstract

Medical data refers to health-related information associated with regular patient care or as part of a clinical trial program. There are many categories of such data, such as clinical imaging data, bio-signal data, electronic health records (EHR), and multi-modality medical data. With the development of deep neural networks in the last decade, the emerging pre-training paradigm has become dominant in that it has significantly improved machine learning methods′ performance in a data-limited scenario. In recent years, studies of pre-training in the medical domain have achieved significant progress. To summarize these technology advancements, this work provides a comprehensive survey of recent advances for pre-training on several major types of medical data. In this survey, we summarize a large number of related publications and the existing benchmarking in the medical domain. Especially, the survey briefly describes how some pre-training methods are applied to or developed for medical data. From a data-driven perspective, we examine the extensive use of pre-training in many medical scenarios. Moreover, based on the summary of recent pre-training studies, we identify several challenges in this field to provide insights for future studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11633-022-1382-8

Cites

232 of 235 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–235 of 235

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. B. Ramsundar, P. Eastman, P. Walters, V. Pande. Deep Learning for the Life Sciences: Applying Deep Learning to Genomics, Microscopy, Drug Discovery, and More, Sebastopol, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2019.
  2. V. Jain, E. Learned-Miller. Online domain adaptation of a pre-trained cascade of classifiers. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Colorado Springs, USA, pp. 577–584, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CV-PR.2011.5995317. · DOI
  3. P. Bilic, P. F. Christ, E. Vorontsov, G. Chlebus, H. Chen, Q. Dou, C. W. Fu, X. Han, P. A. Heng, J. Hesser, S. Kadoury, T. K. Konopczynski, M. Le, C. M. Li, X. M. Li, J. Lipková, J. S. Lowengrub, H. Meine, J. H. Moltz, C. Pal, M. Piraud, X. J. Qi, J. Qi, M. Rempfler, K. Roth, A. Schenk, A. Sekuboyina, P. Zhou, C. Hülsemeyer, M. Beetz, F. Ettlinger, F. Grün, G. Kaissis, F. Lohöfer, R. Braren, J. Holch, F. Hofmann, W. H. Sommer, V. Heinemann, C. Jacobs, G. E. H. Mamani, B. van Ginneken, G. Chartrand, A. Tang, M. Drozdzal, A. Ben-Cohen, E. Klang, M. M. Amitai, E. Konen, H. Greenspan, J. Moreau, A. Hostettler, L. Soler, R. Vivanti, A. Szeskin, N. Lev-Cohain, J. Sosna, L. Joskowicz, B. H. Menze. The liver tumor segmentation benchmark (LiTS). [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04056, 2019. · arXiv
  4. G. B. Moody, W. K. Muldrow, R. G. Mark. A noise stress test for arrhythmia detectors. Computers in Cardiology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 381–384, 1984.
  5. G. B. Moody, R. G. Mark. Development and evaluation of a 2-lead ECG analysis program. Computers in Cardiology, vol. 1982, pp. 39–44, 1982.
  6. K. M. He, X. Y. Zhang, S. Q. Ren, J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vegas, USA, pp. 770–778, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CV-PR.2016.90. · DOI
  7. K. M. He, X. L. Chen, S. N. Xie, Y. H. Li, P. Dollár, R. Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, New Orleans, USA, pp. 15979–15988, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CV-PR52688.2022.01553. · DOI
  8. A. Fernandez-Quilez. Deep Learning for an Improved Diagnostic Pathway of Prostate Cancer in a Small Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Data Regime, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway, 2022.
  9. N. Wagh, J. H. Wei, S. Rawal, B. M. Berry, L. Barnard, B. Brinkmann, G. Worrell, D. Jones, Y. Varatharajah. Domain-guided self-supervision of EEG data improves downstream classification performance and generalizability. In Proceedings of Machine Learning for Health, pp. 130–142, 2021.
  10. L. H. Li, M. Yatskar, D. Yin, C. J. Hsieh, K. W. Chang. VisualBERT: A simple and performant baseline or vision and language. [Online], Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03557, 2019. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, Y., Lin, F., Chen, W., & Xu, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Chen, Weitong
Venue
Machine Intelligence Research
Published
2023-02-21
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
147-179
ISSN
  • 1476-8186 (ISSN-L)
  • 2731-538X
  • 2731-5398
OpenAlex
W4321437302
Cited by
30
References
235
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Machine Intelligence Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Adelaide
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
pre-training, health data, deep neural network, electronic health records, multimodal medical data, benchmarking, transfer learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review