The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Summary: This scorecard summarises key indicators of the burden of osteoporosis and its management in the 27 member states of the European Union, as well as the UK and Switzerland. The resulting scorecard elements, assembled on a single sheet, provide a unique overview of osteoporosis in Europe. Introduction: The scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe (SCOPE) is a project of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) that seeks to raise awareness of osteoporosis care in Europe. The aim of this project was to develop a scorecard and background documents to draw attention to gaps and inequalities in the provision of primary and secondary prevention of fractures due to osteoporosis. Methods: The SCOPE panel reviewed the information available on osteoporosis and the resulting fractures for each of the 27 countries of the European Union plus the UK and Switzerland (termed EU27+2). The information obtained covered four domains: background information (e.g. the burden of osteoporosis and fractures), policy framework, service provision and service uptake, e.g. the proportion of men and women at high risk that do not receive treatment (the treatment gap). Results: There was a marked difference in fracture risk among the EU27+2 countries. Of concern was the marked heterogeneity in the policy framework, service provision and service uptake for osteoporotic fracture that bore little relation to the fracture burden. For example, despite the wide availability of treatments to prevent fractures, in the majority of the EU27+2, only a minority of patients at high risk receive treatment even after their first fracture. The elements of each domain in each country were scored and coded using a traffic light system (red, orange, green) and used to synthesise a scorecard. The resulting scorecard elements, assembled on a single sheet, provide a unique overview of osteoporosis in Europe. Conclusions: The scorecard enables healthcare professionals and policy makers to assess their country’s general approach to the disease and provide indicators to inform the future provision of healthcare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010
Gustavsson, A., Svensson, M., Jacobi, F., Allgulander, C., Alonso, J., Beghi, E., Dodel, R., Ekman, M., Faravelli, C., Fratiglioni, L., et al. (2011) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.08.008 · Cited by 1,723
Updated Data on Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Levels of US Adults
Looker, A. C., Wahner, H. W., Dunn, W. L., Calvo, M. S., Harris, T. B., Heyse, S. P., Johnston Jr, C. C., & Lindsay, R. (1998) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050093 · Cited by 1,121
Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review
Cutler, R. L., Fernandez-Llimos, F., Frommer, M., Benrimoj, C., & Garcia-Cardenas, V. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016982 · Cited by 900
Problems with primary care data quality: osteoporosis as an exemplar
DeLusignan, S., Valentin, T., Chan, T., Hague, N., Wood, O., VanVlymen, J., & Dhoul, N. (2004) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v12i3.120 · Cited by 49
Cited by
UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Gregson, C. L., Armstrong, D. J., Bowden, J., Cooper, C., Edwards, J., Gittoes, N. J. L., Harvey, N., Kanis, J., Leyland, S., Low, R., et al. (2022) · Archives of Osteoporosis · doi:10.1007/s11657-022-01061-5 · Cited by 593
Self-citationVoulgaridou, G., Papadopoulou, S. K., Detopoulou, P., Tsoumana, D., Giaginis, C., Kondyli, F. S., Lymperaki, E., & Pritsa, A. (2023) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases11010029 · Cited by 135
An Overlooked Bone Metabolic Disorder: Cigarette Smoking-Induced Osteoporosis
Weng, W., Li, H., & Zhu, S. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13050806 · Cited by 65
The potential role for artificial intelligence in fracture risk prediction
Hong, N., Whittier, D. E., Glüer, C.-C., & Leslie, W. D. (2024) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00153-0 · Cited by 53
Hoffmann, I., Kohl, M., von Stengel, S., Jakob, F., Kerschan-Schindl, K., Lange, U., Peters, S., Schoene, D., Sieber, C., Thomasius, F., et al. (2023) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06592-8 · Cited by 49
Regulation of bone mass in inflammatory diseases
Adami, G. (2022) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2021.101611 · Cited by 41
Kistler-Fischbacher, M., Armbrecht, G., Gängler, S., Theiler, R., Rizzoli, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Kanis, J. A., Hofbauer, L. C., Schimmer, R. C., Vellas, B., et al. (2024) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1093/jbmr/zjae054 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanis, J. A., Norton, N., Harvey, N. C., Jacobson, T., Johansson, H., Lorentzon, M., McCloskey, E. V., Willers, C., & Borgström, F.
- Venue
- Archives of Osteoporosis
- Published
- 2021-06-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-82
- ISSN
- 1862-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1862-3522
- OpenAlex
- W3164857664
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 87.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.