Development and characterization of PLA/PCL blend filaments and 3D printed scaffolds
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 80/20 PLA/PCL blend ratio was used to fabricate blends, and both the mechanical and thermal properties of the resulting 3D printed scaffolds were significantly improved.
“In other studies, this PLA/PCL blend ratio (i.e., 80/20) was also used to fabricate the blends and it was found that both the mechanical and thermal properties of the resulting 3D printed scaffolds were significantly improved [94,95].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Eryildiz, M., Karakus, A., & Altan Eksi, M.
- Affiliations
- Beykent University (TR)
- ORCID
- Eryildiz, Meltem
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
- Published
- 2024-10-25
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 14043-14054
- ISSN
- 1059-9495 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1024
- OpenAlex
- W4403763309
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance (publishedVersion)
- Beykent University Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, PLA/PCL blends, 3D-printed scaffolds, tissue engineering scaffolds, twin-screw extrusion, filament fabrication, mechanical properties, thermal properties, rheological properties, morphology (materials science)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
