Neuropathology of mild traumatic brain injury: relationship to neuroimaging findings
Abstract
Neuroimaging identified abnormalities associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are but gross indicators that reflect underlying trauma-induced neuropathology at the cellular level. This review examines how cellular pathology relates to neuroimaging findings with the objective of more closely relating how neuroimaging findings reveal underlying neuropathology. Throughout this review an attempt will be made to relate what is directly known from post-mortem microscopic and gross anatomical studies of TBI of all severity levels to the types of lesions and abnormalities observed in contemporary neuroimaging of TBI, with an emphasis on mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, it is impossible to discuss the neuropathology of mTBI without discussing what occurs with more severe injury and viewing pathological changes on some continuum from the mildest to the most severe. Historical milestones in understanding the neuropathology of mTBI are reviewed along with implications for future directions in the examination of neuroimaging and neuropathological correlates of TBI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
mTBI-induced pathophysiology may further increase inter- and intra-individual variability in response to NIBS compared to healthy subjects.
“Consequently, mTBI induced pathophysiology may further increase inter and intra individual variability in response to NIBS compared to healthy subjects.”
From Investigation of neurobiological responses to theta burst stimulation during recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (2023) · cites this paper as Bigler & Maxwell, 2012
One of the key challenges in mTBI diagnosis and prognosis is heterogeneity, and the diffuse and dynamic nature of mTBI may make each injury potentially unique.
“One of the key challenges in mTBI diagnosis and prognosis is heterogeneity, and it has been proposed that the diffuse and dynamic nature of mTBI may make each injury potentially unique (Bigler & Maxwell, 2012;Coyle et al., 2018).”
From Investigation of neurobiological responses to theta burst stimulation during recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (2023) · cites this paper as Bigler & Maxwell, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 213 · Cited by 311
- Authors
- Bigler, E. D., & Maxwell, W. L.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bigler, Erin D.
- Venue
- Brain Imaging and Behavior
- Published
- 2012-03-21
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 108-136
- ISSN
- 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-7565
- OpenAlex
- W1994026785
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 213
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, neuropathology, neuroimaging findings, cellular pathology
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Injuries, Humans, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review