Cited by 95Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Label-aligned multi-task feature learning for multimodal classification of alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment

Open access
the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Zu, Chen, Jie, Biao, Liu, Mingxia, Chen, Songcan, Shen, Dinggang, Zhang, Daoqiang·2016·Brain Imaging and Behavior

Abstract

Multimodal classification methods using different modalities of imaging and non-imaging data have recently shown great advantages over traditional single-modality-based ones for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as its prodromal stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, to the best of our knowledge, most existing methods focus on mining the relationship across multiple modalities of the same subjects, while ignoring the potentially useful relationship across different subjects. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose a novel learning method for multimodal classification of AD/MCI, by fully exploring the relationships across both modalities and subjects. Specifically, our proposed method includes two subsequent components, i.e., label-aligned multi-task feature selection and multimodal classification. In the first step, the feature selection learning from multiple modalities are treated as different learning tasks and a group sparsity regularizer is imposed to jointly select a subset of relevant features. Furthermore, to utilize the discriminative information among labeled subjects, a new label-aligned regularization term is added into the objective function of standard multi-task feature selection, where label-alignment means that all multi-modality subjects with the same class labels should be closer in the new feature-reduced space. In the second step, a multi-kernel support vector machine (SVM) is adopted to fuse the selected features from multi-modality data for final classification. To validate our method, we perform experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database using baseline MRI and FDG-PET imaging data. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method achieves better classification performance compared with several state-of-the-art methods for multimodal classification of AD/MCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11682-015-9480-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 95

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Liu J Ye J Efficient L1/Lq Norm Regularization Cambridge University Pub 2010
  2. Obozinski G Jordan M Taskar B Multi-task feature selection The Workshop of Structural Knowledge Transfer for Machine Learning in International Conference on Machine Learning Citeseer 2006 7 2 1693 1696

Authors
Initiative, T. A. D. N., Zu, C., Jie, B., Liu, M., Chen, S., Shen, D., & Zhang, D.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shen, Dinggang
  • Zhang, Daoqiang
Venue
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Published
2015-11-16
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
1148-1159
ISSN
  • 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7565
OpenAlex
W2179914359
Cited by
95
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61422204, 61473149, 61170151)
  • the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar (BK20130034)
  • the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20123218110009)
  • the NUAA Fundamental Research Funds (NE2013105)
  • National Institutes of Health (EB006733, EB008374, EB009634, MH100217, AG041721, AG042599)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, multimodal classification, group sparsity, multi-kernel support vector machine, magnetic resonance imaging, FDG-PET, ADNI
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Databases, Factual, Disease Progression, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review