Label-aligned multi-task feature learning for multimodal classification of alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment
Open accessAbstract
Multimodal classification methods using different modalities of imaging and non-imaging data have recently shown great advantages over traditional single-modality-based ones for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as its prodromal stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, to the best of our knowledge, most existing methods focus on mining the relationship across multiple modalities of the same subjects, while ignoring the potentially useful relationship across different subjects. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose a novel learning method for multimodal classification of AD/MCI, by fully exploring the relationships across both modalities and subjects. Specifically, our proposed method includes two subsequent components, i.e., label-aligned multi-task feature selection and multimodal classification. In the first step, the feature selection learning from multiple modalities are treated as different learning tasks and a group sparsity regularizer is imposed to jointly select a subset of relevant features. Furthermore, to utilize the discriminative information among labeled subjects, a new label-aligned regularization term is added into the objective function of standard multi-task feature selection, where label-alignment means that all multi-modality subjects with the same class labels should be closer in the new feature-reduced space. In the second step, a multi-kernel support vector machine (SVM) is adopted to fuse the selected features from multi-modality data for final classification. To validate our method, we perform experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database using baseline MRI and FDG-PET imaging data. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method achieves better classification performance compared with several state-of-the-art methods for multimodal classification of AD/MCI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protein structure is related to AD.
“Other investigations [12] have shown that protein structure is related to AD.”
From An Efficient Classifier for Alzheimer’s Disease Genes Identification (2018) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 95
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Liu J Ye J Efficient L1/Lq Norm Regularization Cambridge University Pub 2010
- Obozinski G Jordan M Taskar B Multi-task feature selection The Workshop of Structural Knowledge Transfer for Machine Learning in International Conference on Machine Learning Citeseer 2006 7 2 1693 1696
- Authors
- Initiative, T. A. D. N., Zu, C., Jie, B., Liu, M., Chen, S., Shen, D., & Zhang, D.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
- Anhui Normal University (CN)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Dinggang
- Zhang, Daoqiang
- Venue
- Brain Imaging and Behavior
- Published
- 2015-11-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1148-1159
- ISSN
- 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-7565
- PMC
- PMC4868803
- OpenAlex
- W2179914359
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61422204, 61473149, 61170151)
- the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar (BK20130034)
- the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20123218110009)
- the NUAA Fundamental Research Funds (NE2013105)
- National Institutes of Health (EB006733, EB008374, EB009634, MH100217, AG041721, AG042599)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, multimodal classification, group sparsity, multi-kernel support vector machine, magnetic resonance imaging, FDG-PET, ADNI
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Databases, Factual, Disease Progression, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction, Multimodal Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review