Cited by 20Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

Laparoscopic Conversion to Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Intractable Dumping Syndrome After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass—Two Case Reports

Open access
Huang, Chih-Kun, Wang, Ming-Yu, Das, Siddharth Sankar, Chang, Po-Chih·2015·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Dumping syndrome is not infrequent after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and could result in dreaded complications, such as neuroglycopenia. For those refractory to diet modification or/and medication, regarded as intractable dumping syndrome, revision procedures should be taken into consideration. Herein, we make a video presentation of laparoscopic revision surgery for intractable dumping syndrome with unsatisfactory weight loss. Methods Two diabetic, morbidly obese women (initial body mass index 36.6 and 41.4 kg/m(2)) presented with intractable dumping syndrome 2 and 3 years after initial LRYGB, respectively. In addition, these patients had insufficient weight loss (body mass index 29 and 31 kg/m(2)). Laparoscopic revision procedure of loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy was conducted to relieve their intractable conditions. Results The mean operation time was 174 min (160 and 188), and the average blood loss was 60 mL (50 and 70). There was no intraoperative complication. Both patients had uneventful postoperative courses, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The uncomfortable symptoms relieved successfully after the revision surgery. The Sigstad's score decreased to 2 points 6 months later, and the body mass index reduced to 26 and 28 kg/m(2). Conclusions Though long-term follow-up is warranted to draw a definite conclusion, loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for pyloric restoration and malabsorptive effect remains an acceptable revision procedure to relive intractable dumping syndrome and successfully maintain sustained weight loss in our patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-015-1608-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various surgical re-interventions have been used, including gastric tube placement, gastric bypass reversal with or without concomitant sleeve resection and gastric pouch restriction.

    “Various surgical re-interventions have been used, including gastric tube placement, gastric bypass reversal with or without concomitant sleeve resection and gastric pouch restriction (Table 5) (66,103,105-123).”

    From Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management (2017) · cites this paper as [112]

    The Abstract (p. 1) reports a surgical revision for intractable dumping syndrome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: conversion to loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Our copy does not describe gastric tube placement, bypass reversal with or without sleeve resection, or gastric pouch restriction as the listed alternatives. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Approximately 24% of patients who underwent surgical re-intervention because of refractory severe post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass hypoglycemia received a gastric bypass reversal and approximately 9% had gastric pouch restriction.

    “As shown in Table 5, approximately 24% of patients who underwent surgical re-intervention because of refractory severe post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass hypoglycemia received a gastric bypass reversal (66,103,106-113) and approximately 9% had gastric pouch restriction (66,114,115).”

    From Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management (2017) · cites this paper as [112]

    The Abstract (p. 1) describes two patients who underwent conversion to loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for intractable dumping syndrome. Searches for gastric bypass reversal, gastric pouch restriction, and the stated percentages found no passage reporting the 24% or 9% figures. The case reports do not establish those proportions among patients undergoing surgical re-intervention. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, C.-K., Wang, M.-Y., Das, S. S., & Chang, P.-C.
Affiliations
E-Da Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Po-Chih
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
947-947
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2119034215
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
MeSH terms
Dumping Syndrome, Duodenum, Female, Humans, Jejunum, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Video Recording, Gastric Bypass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review