Cited by 49Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBody Contouring and Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Efficacy and Safety of a Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background Intragastric balloons have been used to bridge the obesity treatment gap with the benefits of being minimally invasive but still required endoscopy. The Elipse intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a swallowable balloon that is spontaneously excreted through a natural orifice at approximately 16 weeks. Several concerns exist, including the treatment efficacy and risk of bowel obstruction. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EIGB. Methods A literature search was performed from several databases from database inception to November 2019. Eligible studies must report percent total weight loss (%TWL) after completion of treatment and adverse events. The pooled means and proportions of our data were analyzed using random effects model, generic inverse variance method. Results Six studies involving 2013 unique patients met our eligibility criteria and were included. The mean baseline BMI ranged from 30.6 to 36.2. The pooled early removal rate was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.1-3.5%; I 2 31%). The pooled %TWL after completion of treatment (4-6 months) was 12.8% (95% CI, 11.6-13.9%; I 2 83%) and at 12 months was 10.9% (95% CI, 5.0-16.9%, I 2 98%). For serious adverse events, three patients had small bowel obstruction, and one patient had gastric perforation requiring surgery. Early expulsion by emesis and early deflation were seen in 3 and 9 patients, respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrates that EIGB is a safe device offering an effective weight loss that warrants further studies for its long-term weight loss outcomes. Severe adverse events are rare, and the rate of early removal is low.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-020-04522-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults--The evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl 2):51S–209S.
  2. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):159–91. · DOI
  3. Kim SH, Chun HJ, Choi HS, et al. Current status of intragastric balloon for obesity treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(24):5495–504. · DOI
  4. Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, Abu Dayyeh BK. Endoscopic bariatric therapy: a guide to the intragastric balloon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(9):1421–31. · DOI
  5. Machytka E, Chuttani R, Bojkova M, et al. Elipse, a procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):512–6. · DOI
  6. Genco A, Ernesti I, Ienca R, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new swallowable intragastric balloon not needing endoscopy: early Italian experience. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):405–9. · DOI
  7. Choi SJ, Choi HS. Various intragastric balloons under clinical investigation. Clin Endosc. 2018;51(5):407–15. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Vitiello A, et al. Elipse balloon: the pitfalls of excessive simplicity. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1419–21. · DOI
  9. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046–55. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Machytka E, Chuttani R, Bojkova M, et al. Elipse, a procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):512–6. · DOI
  13. Alsabah S, Al Haddad E, Ekrouf S, et al. The safety and efficacy of the procedureless intragastric balloon. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):311–7. · DOI
  14. Espinet Coll E, Carrasco Clavijos S, Diaz Galan P, et al. Feasibility, results and endoscopic requirements of the Elipse(R) swallowable intragastric balloon: initial experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019;111 · DOI
  15. Roberta Ienca AD, GiardielloC, Rosa M, Jarallah M, Kolmer S, Hugues SEBBAG, Hansoulle J, Quartararo G, Zouaghi A, Juneja GK, Arau RT, Pomar AP, Badiuddin F, Dargent J, Durou J, Urbain P, Paveliu S, di Cola RS, Selvaggio C, Alkuwari M. Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: Multi-Center Experience in 1623 Consecutive Patients. 2019. p. S33. · DOI
  16. Jamal MH, Almutairi R, Elabd R, et al. The safety and efficacy of procedureless gastric balloon: a study examining the effect of Elipse Intragastric balloon safety, short and medium term effects on weight loss with 1-year follow-up post-removal. Obes Surg. 2019;29(4):1236–41. · DOI
  17. Yannis Raftopoulos ED, Karen R, Kristen C, et al. An intensive 52-week nutritional, Exercise and Behavior Modification Program: Comparison With or Without the Elipse Intragastric Balloon. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2019; · DOI
  18. Kozlowski T, Kozakiewicz K, Dadan J, et al. Innovative solutions in bariatric surgery. Gland Surg. 2016;5(5):529–36. · DOI
  19. Glass J, Chaudhry A, Zeeshan MS, et al. New era: endoscopic treatment options in obesity-a paradigm shift. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(32):4567–79. · DOI
  20. Zheng Y, Wang M, He S, et al. Short-term effects of intragastric balloon in association with conservative therapy on weight loss: a meta-analysis. J Transl Med. 2015;13:246. · DOI
  21. Bazerbachi F, Vargas Valls EJ, Abu Dayyeh BK. Recent clinical results of endoscopic bariatric therapies as an obesity intervention. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(1):42–50. · DOI
  22. Ribeiro da Silva J, Proenca L, Rodrigues A, et al. Intragastric balloon for obesity treatment: safety, tolerance, and efficacy. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018;25(5):236–42. · DOI
  23. Meshkinpour H, Hsu D, Farivar S. Effect of gastric bubble as a weight reduction device: a controlled, crossover study. Gastroenterology. 1988;95(3):589–92. · DOI
  24. Force ABET, Committee AT, Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. ASGE bariatric endoscopy task force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(3):425–38. e5 · DOI
  25. Sullivan S, Swain J, Woodman G, et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial of the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(12):1876–89. · DOI
  26. Stavrou G, Tsaousi G, Kotzampassi K. Life-threatening visceral complications after intragastric balloon insertion: is the device, the patient or the doctor to blame? Endosc Int Open. 2019;7(2):E122–E9. · DOI
  27. Voelker R. Deaths reported after intragastric balloon surgery. JAMA. 2017;318(11):996. · DOI
  28. Finkelstein EA, Verghese NR. Incremental cost-effectiveness of evidence-based non-surgical weight loss strategies. Clin Obes. 2019;9(2):e12294. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vantanasiri, K., Matar, R., Beran, A., & Jaruvongvanich, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
3341-3346
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W3014345206
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
intragastric balloon
MeSH terms
Humans, Obesity, Morbid, Vomiting, Weight Loss, Gastric Balloon, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review