The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Efficacy and Safety of a Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background Intragastric balloons have been used to bridge the obesity treatment gap with the benefits of being minimally invasive but still required endoscopy. The Elipse intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a swallowable balloon that is spontaneously excreted through a natural orifice at approximately 16 weeks. Several concerns exist, including the treatment efficacy and risk of bowel obstruction. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EIGB. Methods A literature search was performed from several databases from database inception to November 2019. Eligible studies must report percent total weight loss (%TWL) after completion of treatment and adverse events. The pooled means and proportions of our data were analyzed using random effects model, generic inverse variance method. Results Six studies involving 2013 unique patients met our eligibility criteria and were included. The mean baseline BMI ranged from 30.6 to 36.2. The pooled early removal rate was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.1-3.5%; I 2 31%). The pooled %TWL after completion of treatment (4-6 months) was 12.8% (95% CI, 11.6-13.9%; I 2 83%) and at 12 months was 10.9% (95% CI, 5.0-16.9%, I 2 98%). For serious adverse events, three patients had small bowel obstruction, and one patient had gastric perforation requiring surgery. Early expulsion by emesis and early deflation were seen in 3 and 9 patients, respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrates that EIGB is a safe device offering an effective weight loss that warrants further studies for its long-term weight loss outcomes. Severe adverse events are rare, and the rate of early removal is low.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IGB therapy is a short-term, minimally invasive intervention for weight loss in obese individuals, typically promoting total body weight loss ranging from 7.5% to 14%.
“IGB therapy represents a short-term, minimally invasive intervention for weight loss in obese individuals, typically promoting a total body weight loss (TBWL) ranging from 7.5% to 14% [64,65,66,67].”
From Impact of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Therapies on Liver Health in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Review (2025) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
Guh, D. P., Zhang, W., Bansback, N., Amarsi, Z., Birmingham, C. L., & Anis, A. H. (2009) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-88 · Cited by 3,855
Ponce, J., Woodman, G., Swain, J., Wilson, E., English, W., Ikramuddin, S., Bour, E., Edmundowicz, S., Snyder, B., Soto, F., et al. (2015) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.12.006 · Cited by 279
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults--The evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl 2):51S–209S.
- Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):159–91. · DOI
- Kim SH, Chun HJ, Choi HS, et al. Current status of intragastric balloon for obesity treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(24):5495–504. · DOI
- Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, Abu Dayyeh BK. Endoscopic bariatric therapy: a guide to the intragastric balloon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(9):1421–31. · DOI
- Machytka E, Chuttani R, Bojkova M, et al. Elipse, a procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):512–6. · DOI
- Genco A, Ernesti I, Ienca R, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new swallowable intragastric balloon not needing endoscopy: early Italian experience. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):405–9. · DOI
- Choi SJ, Choi HS. Various intragastric balloons under clinical investigation. Clin Endosc. 2018;51(5):407–15. · DOI · Paper page
- Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Vitiello A, et al. Elipse balloon: the pitfalls of excessive simplicity. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1419–21. · DOI
- DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88. · DOI · Paper page
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. · DOI · Paper page
- Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046–55. · DOI · Paper page
- Machytka E, Chuttani R, Bojkova M, et al. Elipse, a procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):512–6. · DOI
- Alsabah S, Al Haddad E, Ekrouf S, et al. The safety and efficacy of the procedureless intragastric balloon. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):311–7. · DOI
- Espinet Coll E, Carrasco Clavijos S, Diaz Galan P, et al. Feasibility, results and endoscopic requirements of the Elipse(R) swallowable intragastric balloon: initial experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019;111 · DOI
- Roberta Ienca AD, GiardielloC, Rosa M, Jarallah M, Kolmer S, Hugues SEBBAG, Hansoulle J, Quartararo G, Zouaghi A, Juneja GK, Arau RT, Pomar AP, Badiuddin F, Dargent J, Durou J, Urbain P, Paveliu S, di Cola RS, Selvaggio C, Alkuwari M. Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: Multi-Center Experience in 1623 Consecutive Patients. 2019. p. S33. · DOI
- Jamal MH, Almutairi R, Elabd R, et al. The safety and efficacy of procedureless gastric balloon: a study examining the effect of Elipse Intragastric balloon safety, short and medium term effects on weight loss with 1-year follow-up post-removal. Obes Surg. 2019;29(4):1236–41. · DOI
- Yannis Raftopoulos ED, Karen R, Kristen C, et al. An intensive 52-week nutritional, Exercise and Behavior Modification Program: Comparison With or Without the Elipse Intragastric Balloon. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2019; · DOI
- Kozlowski T, Kozakiewicz K, Dadan J, et al. Innovative solutions in bariatric surgery. Gland Surg. 2016;5(5):529–36. · DOI
- Glass J, Chaudhry A, Zeeshan MS, et al. New era: endoscopic treatment options in obesity-a paradigm shift. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(32):4567–79. · DOI
- Zheng Y, Wang M, He S, et al. Short-term effects of intragastric balloon in association with conservative therapy on weight loss: a meta-analysis. J Transl Med. 2015;13:246. · DOI
- Bazerbachi F, Vargas Valls EJ, Abu Dayyeh BK. Recent clinical results of endoscopic bariatric therapies as an obesity intervention. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(1):42–50. · DOI
- Ribeiro da Silva J, Proenca L, Rodrigues A, et al. Intragastric balloon for obesity treatment: safety, tolerance, and efficacy. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018;25(5):236–42. · DOI
- Meshkinpour H, Hsu D, Farivar S. Effect of gastric bubble as a weight reduction device: a controlled, crossover study. Gastroenterology. 1988;95(3):589–92. · DOI
- Force ABET, Committee AT, Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. ASGE bariatric endoscopy task force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(3):425–38. e5 · DOI
- Sullivan S, Swain J, Woodman G, et al. Randomized sham-controlled trial of the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(12):1876–89. · DOI
- Stavrou G, Tsaousi G, Kotzampassi K. Life-threatening visceral complications after intragastric balloon insertion: is the device, the patient or the doctor to blame? Endosc Int Open. 2019;7(2):E122–E9. · DOI
- Voelker R. Deaths reported after intragastric balloon surgery. JAMA. 2017;318(11):996. · DOI
- Finkelstein EA, Verghese NR. Incremental cost-effectiveness of evidence-based non-surgical weight loss strategies. Clin Obes. 2019;9(2):e12294. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tasabehji, D., Saleh, S., & Mokadem, M. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14124012 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Vantanasiri, K., Matar, R., Beran, A., & Jaruvongvanich, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
- Venue
- Obesity Surgery
- Published
- 2020-04-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3341-3346
- ISSN
- 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-0428
- OpenAlex
- W3014345206
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
- Keywords
- intragastric balloon
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Obesity, Morbid, Vomiting, Weight Loss, Gastric Balloon, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review