Cited by 44Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Sutureless Duodeno-Ileal Anastomosis with Self-Assembling Magnets: Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Metabolic Procedure

Schlottmann, Francisco, Ryou, Marvin, Lautz, David, Thompson, Christopher C., Buxhoeveden, Rudolf·2021·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Less invasive and safer anastomotic techniques are desirable. We aimed to determine technical feasibility and safety of sutureless duodeno-ileal side-to-side anastomosis in obese patients using self-assembling magnets. Methods This was an open-label, prospective, and single-arm study including obese patients (BMI 30-50 kg/m 2) with type II diabetes. The ileal magnet was deployed laparoscopically, and the duodenal magnet was deployed endoscopically. Both magnets were coupled under laparoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The primary endpoints were technical feasibility and safety. The secondary endpoints were patency of the anastomosis, HbA1c reduction, and weight loss 12 months after the procedure. Results A total of 8 patients were enrolled in the study; median age was 51.5 years (range: 34-65), and median BMI was 38.8 kg/m 2 (range: 35-47.9). The mean procedural duration was 63.5 min (range: 41-95). No intraoperative complications were recorded, and no major postoperative morbidity related to the procedure occurred. Magnets were expelled at a median of 29.5 days after the procedure with no associated complications. Upper endoscopy at 12 months confirmed patent anastomoses with healthy-appearing mucosa in all patients. HbA1c reduced below 7.0% in 6 out of 8 (75%) patients, and greater than 5% of total body weight loss was observed in 7 out of 8 (87.5%) patients at 12 months. Conclusions Sutureless duodeno-ileal side-to-side anastomosis using self-assembling magnets is feasible and safe in obese patients, and a dual-path enteral diversion with large-caliber and durable anastomosis can be achieved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-021-05554-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlottmann, F., Ryou, M., Lautz, D., Thompson, C. C., & Buxhoeveden, R.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Alemán (AR)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Emerson Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Schlottmann, Francisco
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2021-06-28
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
4195-4202
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W3177057701
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
MeSH terms
Anastomosis, Surgical, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Prospective Studies, Magnets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review