Cited by 28Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Safe Continuation of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists at Endoscopy: A Case Series of 57 Adults Undergoing Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

Maselli, Daniel B., Lee, Daniel, Bi, Danse, Jirapinyo, Pichamol, Thompson, Christopher C., Donnangelo, Lauren L., McGowan, Christopher E.·2024·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Purpose Glucagon-like receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have raised peri-procedural concerns due to their potential to delay gastric emptying. The American Association of Anesthesiologists has advised pausing a single dose before elective endoscopy. However, a subsequent directive from multiple gastroenterology societies underscored the need for further assessment to substantiate this practice. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of serious adverse events and retained gastric products during endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) with uninterrupted GLP1-RA use. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing ESG while on GLP1-RAs at three centers from August 2022 to February 2024. Per standard protocol, all patients had refrained from solid foods for at least 24 h and maintained nil per os for 12 h preceding their ESG. Records were reviewed for patient characteristics and medication type and doses. Primary outcomes included serious adverse events and retained gastric products based on patient records, procedure reports, and procedural videos. Results Fifty-seven consecutive adults (89.5% women, mean age of 44 ± 9 years, mean BMI of 40.1 ± 8.1 kg/m 2 , 35.1% with T2DM, and 26.3% with pre-T2DM) underwent ESG without stopping GLP1-RAs, which included semaglutide (45.6%), liraglutide (19.3%), dulaglutide (22.8%), and tirzepatide (12.3%). During intubation, endoscopy, and recovery, there were no instances of retained gastric solids, pulmonary aspir…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-024-07278-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current guidelines and consensus statements on the management of GLP-1 and GIP in the perioperative period are based on retrospective observational studies.

    “Current guidelines and consensus statements on the management of GLP-1 and GIP in the perioperative period are based on retrospective observational studies.12,13,14”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 28

Authors
Maselli, D. B., Lee, D., Bi, D., Jirapinyo, P., Thompson, C. C., Donnangelo, L. L., & McGowan, C. E.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
McGowan, Christopher E.
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2024-05-16
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
2369-2374
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W4396955153
Cited by
28
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Semaglutide, Adult, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Gastroplasty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review