CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Conflict Management and NegotiationTeam Dynamics and PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

When good conflict gets better and bad conflict becomes worse: the role of social capital in the conflict–innovation relationship

Open access
De Clercq, Dirk, Thongpapanl, Narongsak, Dimov, Dimo·2009·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
DOI 10.1007/s11747-008-0122-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11747-008-0122-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two of the six negative effects, dilution of dialectical process and groupthink, have attracted some attention in the social capital literature to date.

    “Two of these effects, dilution of dialectical process and groupthink, have attracted some attention in the SC literature to date (de Clercq et al. 2009;Villena et al. 2011).”

    From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as de Clercq et al. 2009

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 168

Authors
De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D.
Affiliations
  • Brock University (CA)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-09-25
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
283-297
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7824
DOI
10.1007/s11747-008-0122-0
OpenAlex
W2118052501
Cited by
168
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
task conflict, relationship conflict, social capital, trust, social interaction, innovation, moderating effect, contingency perspective, organizational conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review