The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WAC at a Crossroads
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But postcolonial theory has a growing role in the theoretical framework as a discipline, particularly through work engaged with the World Archaeological Congress (e.g., Lydon and Rizvi 2010; Meskell 2009; Shepherd 2008).”
From The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology (2011) · cites this paper as Shepherd 2008
Citations
Cites
Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking
Allen, B. (2003) · Common Knowledge · doi:10.1215/0961754x-9-3-551 · Cited by 2,918
The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy and the Order of Knowledge
Holy, L., & Mudimbe, V. Y. (1989) · Man · doi:10.2307/2803348 · Cited by 1,724
The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge
Apter, A., & Mudimbe, V. Y. (1991) · Journal of Religion in Africa · doi:10.2307/1580804 · Cited by 1,135
Castillo, S., & Mignolo, W. (2007) · The Modern Language Review · doi:10.2307/20467557 · Cited by 474
Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking
Mignolo, W. D. (2012) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691156095.001.0001 · Cited by 463
Mignolo, W. D. (2005) · Cited by 210
Cited by
Croucher, S. K., & Weiss, L. (2011) · Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0192-6_1 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepherd, N.
- Venue
- Archaeologies
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 1555-8622
- 1935-3987
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WAC at a Crossroads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11759-008-9059-7
- The paper
- Shepherd, N. (2008). WAC at a Crossroads. Archaeologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-008-9059-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
