Cited by 304Infrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Image Based Techniques for Crack Detection, Classification and Quantification in Asphalt Pavement: A Review

Zakeri, H., Nejad, Fereidoon Moghadas, Fahimifar, Ahmad·2017·Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11831-016-9194-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 300 · Cited by 304

Authors
Zakeri, H., Nejad, F. M., & Fahimifar, A.
Affiliations
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Nejad, Fereidoon Moghadas
Venue
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
Published
2016-09-17
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
935-977
ISSN
  • 1134-3060 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-1784
OpenAlex
W2520959394
Cited by
304
References
300
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
asphalt pavement, surface cracking, crack detection, crack classification, crack quantification, image processing, pavement distress, pavement management systems, automated pavement inspection, pavement condition assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review