Image Based Techniques for Crack Detection, Classification and Quantification in Asphalt Pavement: A Review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 300 · Cited by 304
- Authors
- Zakeri, H., Nejad, F. M., & Fahimifar, A.
- Affiliations
- Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Nejad, Fereidoon Moghadas
- Venue
- Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
- Published
- 2016-09-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 935-977
- ISSN
- 1134-3060 (ISSN-L)
- 1886-1784
- OpenAlex
- W2520959394
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 300
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Keywords
- asphalt pavement, surface cracking, crack detection, crack classification, crack quantification, image processing, pavement distress, pavement management systems, automated pavement inspection, pavement condition assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review