Cited by 351Additive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Solidification in direct metal deposition by LENS processing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11837-001-0066-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. M.L. Griffith et al., “Free Form Fabrication of Metallic Components Using Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS™),” Proc. of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp., (Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin), p. 125.
  2. Dave M. Keicher and John M. Smugeresky, “The Laser Forming of Metallic Components Using Particulate Materials,” JOM, 49 (5) (1997), p. 51. · DOI
  3. C.L. Atwood et al., “Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS™): A Tool for Direct Fabrication of Metal Parts,” Proc. Of ICALEO ’98, (Orlando, FL: Laser Institute of America, 1999), p. E-1.
  4. E. Schlienger et al., “Near Net Shape Production of Metal Components Using LENS™,” Proc. of the Third Pacific Rim International Conference on Advanced Materials and Processing, (Warrendale PA: TMS, 1998), p. 1581.
  5. M.L. Griffith et al., “Understanding Thermal Behavior in the LENS™ Process,” J. Materials Design, 20 (2/3) (June 1999), pp. 107–114. · DOI
  6. A. Vasinonta, J.L. Beuth, and M.L. Griffith, “A Process Map for Consistent Build Conditions in the Solid Freeform Fabrication of Thin-Walled Structures,” in press.
  7. M.L. Griffith et al., “Understanding the Microstructure and Properties of Components Fabricated by Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS™),” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 625, (Warrendale, PA: MRS, 2000).
  8. J.A. Brooks et al., “Microstructure and Property Optimization of LENS™ Deposited H13 Tool Steel,” Proc. of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp., (Austin TX: The University of Texas at Austin, 1999), pp. 375–382.
  9. J.E. Smugeresky et al., “Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS™) Process: Optimization of Surface Finish and Microstructural Properties,” Proc. of the World Congress on Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, (Princeton, NJ: MPIF/APMI International, 1997), Part 21.
  10. M.L. Griffith et al., “Multi-Material Processing by LENS™,” Proc. of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp., (Austin TX: The University of Texas at Austin, 1997), p. 387.
  11. D.P. DeWitt and G.D. Nutter, Theory and Practice of Radiation Thermometry (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988). · DOI
  12. A.L. Schaeffler, “Constitution Diagram for Stainless-steel Weld Metal.2. Schaeffler Diagram,” Metal Progress, 106 (1) (1974), p. 227.
  13. D. Rosenthal, “The Theory of Moving Sources of Heat and its Application to Metal Treatments,” Trans. Am. Soc. Min. Engrs., 68 (1946), p. 849.
  14. N. Bloembergen, AIP Conf. Proc. Number 50: Laser-Solid Interactions and Laser Processing—1978, ed. S.D. Ferris, H.J. Leamy, and J.M. Poate (New York: Amer. Inst. of Phys., 1979), pp. 1–8.
  15. B.H. Kear, E.M. Breinan, and L.E. Greenwald, Solidification and Casting of Metals, ed. H.A. Davies (London: The Metals Society, 1979), p. 501.
  16. R.K. Chin, J.L. Beuth, and C.H. Amon, Mechanics of Materials, 24 (1996), p. 257; and W. Hofmeister et al., JOM-e (July 1999), www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/9907/Hofmeister/Hofmeister-9907.html. · DOI
  17. R.C. Ruhl, “Cooling Rates During Splat Quenching,” Mater. Sci. Eng., 1 (1967), pp. 313–320. · DOI
  18. W.H. Hofmeister et al., Solidification 1998, ed. S. Marsh et al. (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1998), pp. 375–387.
  19. C.M. Adams, Jr., “Thermal Considerations in Freezing,” Liquid Metals and Solidification, ed. R. Madden and B. Chalmers (Cleveland, OH: ASM, 1958), pp. 187–217.
  20. S.D.E. Ramati et al., “Forging of Liquid and Partially Solid Sn-15 pct Pb and Aluminum-alloys” Met. Trans. B, 9B (1978), p. 279. · DOI
  21. C.G. Levi and R. Mehrabian, “Heat Flow in Atomized Metal Droplets,” Met. Trans. B, 11B (March 1980), pp. 21–27. · DOI
  22. O. Grong, Metallurgical Modeling of Welding, second edition, (London: The Institute of Materials, 1997), p. 223.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hofmeister, W., & Griffith, M.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Venue
JOM
Published
2001-09
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
30-34
ISSN
  • 0148-6608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1047-4838
  • 1543-1851
OpenAlex
W1970246823
Cited by
351
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
28.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JOM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Keywords
laser engineered net shaping, direct metal deposition, solidification, cooling rate, solid-liquid interface, 316 stainless steel, H13 steel, infrared thermography, metallography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review