Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Agricultural Innovations and PracticesAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Transition from Arid Farming Systems to Agroforestry Systems in Pakistan: A Comparison of Monetary Returns

Abbas, Ghulam, Ali, Akhter, Khan, Muhammad, Mahmood, Hafiz Zahid, Wahab, Sazali Abdul, Amir-ud-Din, Rafi·2021·Small-scale Forestry
DOI 10.1007/s11842-020-09470-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11842-020-09470-5

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Alkire S (2015) Multidimensional poverty in Pakistan. Planning Commission of Pakistan; United Nations Development Programme Pakistan (UNDP); Oxford Poverty and Humand Development Initiative, Islamabad
  2. Anjum K, Khan GS, Afzal M, Khan ZH (2011) Economic comparison of agriculture with agroforestry in Tehsil Kamalia, district Toba Tek Singh, Pakistan. J Agric Res 49:551–561
  3. Bertomeu MG (2003) Smallholder maize-timber agroforestry systems in Northern Mindanao, Philippines: profitability and contribution to the timber industry sector. In: International conference on rural livelihoods, forests and biodiversity, 2003. Citeseer, pp 19–23
  4. Malézieux E et al (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models: a review. Sustainable agriculture. Springer, Berlin, pp 329–353
  5. Rathore SS, Shekhawat K, Singh RK, Upadhyay PK, Singh VK (2019) Best management practices for doubling oilseed productivity: Aiming India for self reliance in edible oil. Indian J Agr Sci 89:1225–1231

Cited by

  • The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review

    Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96

    “For example, the tree cropping and border cropping agroforestry practices in Pakistan had higher production costs for establishing trees compared to the conventional farming system (Abbas et al. 2021).”
    Background

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Abbas, G., Ali, A., Khan, M., Mahmood, H. Z., Wahab, S. A., & Amir-ud-Din, R.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
  • Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Mahmood, Hafiz Zahid
ORCID
Venue
Small-scale Forestry
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-01-30
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
325-350
ISSN
  • 1873-7617 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-7854
DOI
10.1007/s11842-020-09470-5
OpenAlex
W3128594870
Cited by
16
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Small-scale Forestry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
Keywords
agroforestry, tree cultivation, household income, monetary returns, Thal Desert, input costs, agricultural subsidies, agricultural credit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Transition from Arid Farming Systems to Agroforestry Systems in Pakistan: A Comparison of Monetary Returns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11842-020-09470-5
The paper
Abbas, G., Ali, A., Khan, M., Mahmood, H. Z., Wahab, S. A., & Amir-ud-Din, R. (2021). The Transition from Arid Farming Systems to Agroforestry Systems in Pakistan: A Comparison of Monetary Returns. Small-scale Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09470-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.