The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mental health and well-being benefits of exercise during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of medical students and newly qualified doctors in the UK
Open accessAbstract
Background: University students have been uniquely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is currently little data upon the measures that medical students and newly qualified doctors have taken to help their mental well-being and mood during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aim: We aimed to identify the activities respondents found beneficial for their well-being and mental health and recorded a mood score from survey respondents. Methods: A nationwide study was completed to investigate the mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon medical students and newly qualified doctors (interim foundation year one). We received 2075 respondents from across the UK. Results: Physical activity was found to be the most common activity used by the survey respondents to help with their mental well-being (80.1%) (medical students, 83.7%; interim foundation doctors, 72.3%). Participants who stated that exercise helped their well-being had a mean score (SD) of 52.3 (20.7) which was significantly higher (P = 0.048) than those who reported that they did not exercise (49.8 (21.1)). Respondents who stated they had used exercise to help with their mental well-being had (on average) a higher mood score than those who did not. This was seen in both the medical student and interim foundation doctor subgroups. Discussion: Exercise can help to benefit the well-being of medical students and interim foundation doctors. It is hoped that higher education providers and employers recognise the importance of promoting physical activity for the well-being of their students and staff, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Covid-19 has had a drastic impact on the population’s mental health [40–43], including medical students [44–48].”
From Effectiveness of online mindfulness interventions on medical students’ mental health: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729 · Cited by 9,923
Mandolesi, L., Polverino, A., Montuori, S., Foti, F., Ferraioli, G., Sorrentino, P., & Sorrentino, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509 · Cited by 1,038
Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Ma, X., & Di, Q. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17103722 · Cited by 589
Human needs in COVID-19 isolation
Matias, T. S., Dominski, F. H., & Marks, D. F. (2020) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105320925149 · Cited by 420
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of the Covid‐19 pandemic on the health of university students
Ihm, L., Zhang, H., van Vijfeijken, A., & Waugh, M. G. (2021) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.3145 · Cited by 98
COVID-19 mental health consequences on medical students worldwide
Mittal, R., Su, L., & Jain, R. (2021) · Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives · doi:10.1080/20009666.2021.1918475 · Cited by 78
Liu, R., Menhas, R., & Saqib, Z. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349880 · Cited by 89
Fiest, K. M., Leigh, J. P., Krewulak, K. D., Plotnikoff, K. M., Kemp, L. G., Ng-Kamstra, J. S., & Stelfox, H. T. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03090-9 · Cited by 74
Yogeswaran, V., & El Morr, C. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12341-z · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Coyle, C., Ghazi, H., & Georgiou, I.
- Affiliations
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Hull York Medical School (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Coyle, Conor
- Venue
- Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
- Published
- 2020-11-04
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 925-926
- ISSN
- 0021-1265 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-4362
- PMC
- PMC7641255
- OpenAlex
- W3095756139
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- St. George's University of London
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Keywords
- physical activity, mental health, well-being, COVID-19 pandemic, medical students, newly qualified doctors, mood, university students
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Cross-Sectional Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Exercise, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review