CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchEosinophilic EsophagitisChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological aspects of food allergy

Kelsay, Kim·2003·Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
DOI 10.1007/s11882-003-0011-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Food allergies may impact the emotions of patients through both direct and indirect mechanisms. Direct mechanisms include the effects on the central nervous system from biologic mediators released during an allergic reaction to food. Indirect mechanisms include the stress of coping with a food allergy--for example, food preparation and avoidance--as well as managing the fear of the potential consequences of ingesting the food. Indirect effects may also be mediated through family members--for example, the impact of a parent's stress on the child. These relationships are difficult to study, in part because many patients who report food allergy symptoms do not have objective symptoms when challenged with the offending food. Symptoms may be misinterpreted as food allergy more often by patients with certain psychological profiles. In this paper, relevant literature is reviewed, and clinical treatment designed to minimize the emotional suffering of patients and their families is presented through the description of a case vignette.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11882-003-0011-z

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Niestijl JJJ, Kardinaal AFM, Huijbers GH: Prevalence of food allergy and intolerance in the adult Dutch population. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994, 93:446–456. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kelsay, K.
Affiliations
National Jewish Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kelsay, Kim
Venue
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
41-46
ISSN
  • 1529-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6315
DOI
10.1007/s11882-003-0011-z
OpenAlex
W2061909433
Cited by
31
References
35
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Current Allergy and Asthma Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
food allergy, psychological aspects, emotional impact, stress, coping, food avoidance, family stress, parent-child relationship, misdiagnosis, allergic mediators, central nervous system effects, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Cross Reactions, Europe, False Positive Reactions, Food Hypersensitivity, Humans, Immune System, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review