HDL Hypothesis: Where Do We Stand Now?
Abstract
There is robust epidemiological evidence dating back to the original Framingham Heart Study from 1977 that indicates an important inverse relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and risk of incident coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite this body of scientific information demonstrating that low levels of HDL-C are an independent predictor of subsequent CAD events, multiple therapeutic attempts to raise HDL-C levels have failed to demonstrate a consistent reduction in prognostically important endpoints such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Recently, several major randomized trials using different therapeutic interventions have raised appropriate concerns about our basic understanding of HDL-C and whether the "HDL hypothesis" of lowering cardiovascular events through therapeutic interventions directed at raising HDL-C is a scientifically viable one. While two recent randomized controlled trials (AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE) failed to show a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients treated to optimally low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at baseline with extended-release niacin on a background of simvastatin, these clinical trials studied specific populations of stable ischemic heart disease patients. The data from these two contemporary trials cannot be extrapolated to all patient populations, such as those with acute coronary syndromes or myocardial infarction or those with significant residual mixed dyslipidemia not treated with optimal doses of intensive statin therapy, as these patients were excluded by trial design in both studies. Therefore, at the present time, there is insufficient evidence from clinical trials to recommend HDL-targeted therapy for additional event reduction in CAD patients. However, we will review the relevant data from recent major trials (AIM-HIGH, HPS2-THRIVE, ILLUMINATE, and dal-OUTCOMES) and highlight the potential clinical implications of these trials in modern pharmacotherapy as it relates to HDL-C raising and potential cardiovascular event reduction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pharmacological increase of serum HDL levels has not affected the risk of cardiovascular diseases.
“Particularly the latter approach has been a disappointment: pharmacological increase of serum HDL levels has not affected the risk of cardiovascular diseases42”
From Prolonged sleep restriction induces changes in pathways involved in cholesterol metabolism and inflammatory responses (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
The classical view on the relationship between serum lipid levels and risk for cardiovascular events states that serum high LDL and low HDL cholesterol level is a risk combination for cardiovascular events.
“The classical view on the relationship between serum lipid levels and risk for cardiovascular events, formulated based on the findings of the Framingham study41 and since confirmed by many epidemiological studies, states that serum high LDL and low HDL cholesterol level is a risk combination for cardiovascular events42.”
From Prolonged sleep restriction induces changes in pathways involved in cholesterol metabolism and inflammatory responses (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Tariq, S. M., Sidhu, M. S., Toth, P. P., & Boden, W. E.
- Affiliations
- Albany Medical College (US)
- Albany Stratton VA Medical Center Albany (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boden, William E.
- Venue
- Current Atherosclerosis Reports
- Published
- 2014-03-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 398-398
- ISSN
- 1523-3804 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-6242
- OpenAlex
- W2078976092
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Current Atherosclerosis Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- HDL cholesterol, coronary artery disease, HDL-targeted therapy, nicotinic acid, AIM-HIGH trial, ILLUMINATE trial, cardiovascular risk reduction, statin therapy, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, stroke
- MeSH terms
- Anticholesteremic Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Coronary Artery Disease, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review