Incidental Finding of Coronary and Non-Coronary Artery Calcium: What Do Clinicians Need To Know?
Abstract
Purpose of review This review summarizes the role of incidentally and non-incidentally discovered coronary artery calcification (CAC) and the evolving role of non-coronary artery calcification in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. Additionally, this review explores the emerging use of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), radiomics, and natural language processing (NLP) for automated detection, quantification, and communication of these incidentally discovered findings. Recent findings This review summarizes recent findings in the space, including the development of various AI/ML-based approaches for automated calcification quantification and detection. Recent work leverages the use of incidentally discovered CAC and non-coronary calcification (e.g. aortic valve, aortic arch, carotid artery, breast arterial calcification) and their influence on clinical decision-making and prescribing practices. CAC and various forms of non-coronary artery calcifications are increasingly recognized as powerful and additive predictors of ASCVD risk. Advances in AI, ML, and radiomics enable scalable, automated measurement of both incidental and non-incidental CAC and non-coronary calcifications, which will facilitate more precise, personalized ASCVD risk stratification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chest imaging obtained for non-cardiac purposes frequently contains incidental coronary calcium information.
“Chest imaging obtained for non-cardiac purposes, such as low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening or non-contrast chest CT for pulmonary or oncologic evaluation, frequently contains valuable ‘incidental’ coronary calcium information.6”
From Prognostication and clinical opportunities with AI for coronary artery calcium: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Haudenschild, C., Parsa, S., & Rodriguez, F.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Parsa, Shyon
- Venue
- Current Atherosclerosis Reports
- Published
- 2025-07-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-71
- ISSN
- 1523-3804 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-6242
- OpenAlex
- W4412361913
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2025-08-20)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Atherosclerosis Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Keywords
- coronary artery calcification, incidental finding, artificial intelligence, machine learning, radiomics, natural language processing, aortic valve calcification, carotid artery calcification, breast arterial calcification, risk stratification
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Calcium, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Humans, Risk Assessment, Incidental Findings, Vascular Calcification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review