Cited by 5Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsDermatological and Skeletal DisordersCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Incidental Finding of Coronary and Non-Coronary Artery Calcium: What Do Clinicians Need To Know?

Haudenschild, Christian, Parsa, Shyon, Rodriguez, Fatima·2025·Current Atherosclerosis Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review This review summarizes the role of incidentally and non-incidentally discovered coronary artery calcification (CAC) and the evolving role of non-coronary artery calcification in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. Additionally, this review explores the emerging use of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), radiomics, and natural language processing (NLP) for automated detection, quantification, and communication of these incidentally discovered findings. Recent findings This review summarizes recent findings in the space, including the development of various AI/ML-based approaches for automated calcification quantification and detection. Recent work leverages the use of incidentally discovered CAC and non-coronary calcification (e.g. aortic valve, aortic arch, carotid artery, breast arterial calcification) and their influence on clinical decision-making and prescribing practices. CAC and various forms of non-coronary artery calcifications are increasingly recognized as powerful and additive predictors of ASCVD risk. Advances in AI, ML, and radiomics enable scalable, automated measurement of both incidental and non-incidental CAC and non-coronary calcifications, which will facilitate more precise, personalized ASCVD risk stratification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11883-025-01318-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chest imaging obtained for non-cardiac purposes frequently contains incidental coronary calcium information.

    “Chest imaging obtained for non-cardiac purposes, such as low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening or non-contrast chest CT for pulmonary or oncologic evaluation, frequently contains valuable ‘incidental’ coronary calcium information.6”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 98 · Cited by 5

Authors
Haudenschild, C., Parsa, S., & Rodriguez, F.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Current Atherosclerosis Reports
Published
2025-07-12
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
71-71
ISSN
  • 1523-3804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6242
OpenAlex
W4412361913
Cited by
5
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Atherosclerosis Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
coronary artery calcification, incidental finding, artificial intelligence, machine learning, radiomics, natural language processing, aortic valve calcification, carotid artery calcification, breast arterial calcification, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Calcium, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Humans, Risk Assessment, Incidental Findings, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review