Cited by 44Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Role of ambulatory and home blood pressure recording in clinical practice.

Open access
Ghuman, Nimrta, Campbell, Patrick, White, William B.·2009·Current Cardiology Reports

Abstract

Because of shortcomings of the office blood pressure (BP) measurement in individuals with hypertension (eg, white coat and masked hypertension effects, terminal digit bias, and large variability in BP among a small number of readings), use of out-of-office blood pressure measurements has become more common in clinical practice. The presence of the syndromes of white-coat and masked hypertension creates the concern that the office BP measurements are not reflective of an individual patient's true BP values. Home (or self) and ambulatory BP assessments have been used in numerous types of clinical trials and have demonstrated their usefulness as reliable research and clinical tools. In this article, we review the recent literature on the benefits and limitations of home (self) and ambulatory monitoring of the BP in clinical practice. In particular, how it relates to the diagnosis of patients with various presentations of hypertension and to cardio-vascular outcomes with long-term follow-ups of population cohorts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11886-009-0060-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Before baseline measurement, the participant should have been in the chosen posture at least for 5 min.

    “Whatever the posture chosen, it is important that before the baseline measurement, the participant has been in this posture at least for 5 min (Ghuman et al., 2009).”

    From Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting (2017) · cites this paper as Ghuman et al., 2009

    The ‘Technique for Self/Home Blood Pressure Monitoring’ section recommends resting for 5 minutes before a reading, supporting the timing. It specifies that measurements should be taken seated, however, rather than endorsing whatever posture is chosen. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the majority of studies, baseline recording is generally taken while sitting with knees at a 90° angle, both feet flat on the floor, hands on thighs and eyes closed, similar to what is recommended for blood pressure procedures.

    “In the majority of studies, the baseline recording is generally taken while sitting with knees at a 90° angle, both feet flat on the floor, hands on thighs and eyes closed, similar to what is recommended for blood pressure procedures (Pickering et al., 2008; Ghuman et al., 2009).”

    From Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting (2017) · cites this paper as Ghuman et al., 2009

    The “Technique for Self/Home Blood Pressure Monitoring” section (page unavailable) recommends taking blood-pressure readings while seated, with the back supported and forearm at heart level. It does not describe knees at 90°, feet flat, hands on thighs, or eyes closed, and it does not establish how baseline recordings are taken in the majority of studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 44

Authors
Ghuman, N., Campbell, P., & White, W. B.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
White, William B.
Venue
Current Cardiology Reports
Published
2009-11
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
414-421
ISSN
  • 1523-3782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3170
OpenAlex
W1998645279
Cited by
44
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Cardiology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA024667)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, home blood pressure monitoring, self-monitoring, white coat hypertension, masked hypertension, office blood pressure measurement, hypertension diagnosis, cardiovascular outcomes, blood pressure variability
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Hypertension, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review