Understanding Cultural Influences on Dietary Habits in Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latino Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of Current Literature and Future Directions
Abstract
Purpose of review This review focuses on evaluating and identifying gaps in the current literature regarding culturally specific dietary influences for patients with type 2 diabetes. As this topic has previously been examined in African American populations, we chose to focus on four other distinct populations (Hispanic, Middle Eastern, Western Pacific, South Asian). Given the rapid increase in global rates of type 2 diabetes and high rates of diabetes among certain ethnic groups, it is important to understand how culturally adapted strategies in diabetes management have been described in different regions and populations. Recent findings The specific role of nutrition in controlling diabetes is tied to cultural habits and customs. Variation in cultural practices, including diet, create unique environments in which patients with diabetes must navigate. The role of family, particularly among Hispanics, is crucial to cultural adaptations of diabetes management. Incorporating alternative medicine, namely observed in Chinese and Indian populations, also guided diabetes care strategies. Language barriers, health literacy, and acculturation were all unique factors affecting cultural approaches to diabetes management in these four populations. Understanding such cultural determinants is crucial to addressing diabetes disparities and improving outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most existing studies lack representation from Africans and Afro-Caribbean populations where diabetes prevalence is rising.
“Additionally, most existing studies lack representation from Africans and Afro-Caribbean populations where diabetes prevalence is rising [173].”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [173]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Mora, N., & Golden, S. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Golden, Sherita Hill
- ORCID
- Golden, Sherita Hill
- Venue
- Current Diabetes Reports
- Published
- 2017-10-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 126-126
- ISSN
- 1534-4827 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0829
- OpenAlex
- W2765468789
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Diabetes Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, cultural influences on diet, dietary habits, Asian patients, Middle Eastern patients, Hispanic patients, South Asian patients, family involvement in diabetes care, traditional medicine, language barriers, health literacy, acculturation, diabetes disparities
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Middle East, Asian People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review