A Comparison of Law Enforcement Divorce Rates with Those of Other Occupations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Divorce rates for correctional workers, police, and firefighters are comparable to or lower than the general population.
“the divorce rates for correctional workers, police, and firefighters are comparable to or lower than the general population69”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- McCoy, S. P., & Aamodt, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Radford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aamodt, Michael G.
- Venue
- Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
- Published
- 2009-10-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0882-0783 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6469
- OpenAlex
- W2122285235
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- divorce rates, law enforcement officers, police officers, occupational differences, marital stability, census data, occupational stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
