Police empathy and victim PTSD as potential factors in rape case attrition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is well known from victimology that victims establish a better rapport with police if their concerns are listened to and their listeners show empathy towards them.
“It is well known from victimology (e.g., Lonsway and Archambault 2021; Maddox et al. 2011; Patterson 2011) that victims establish a better rapport with police if their concerns are listened to and their listeners show empathy towards them.”
From “If We Don’t Listen to Them, We Make Them Lose More than Money:” Exploring Reasons for Underreporting and the Needs of Older Scam Victims (2023) · cites this paper as Maddox et al. 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Maddox, L., Lee, D., & Barker, C.
- Affiliations
- Maudsley Hospital (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Maddox, Lucy
- Venue
- Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
- Published
- 2010-08-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 112-117
- ISSN
- 0882-0783 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6469
- OpenAlex
- W2068131022
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Keywords
- rape victims, post-traumatic stress disorder, shame, self-blame, police interviews, police training, sexual assault
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
