Acceptance and related processes in adjustment to chronic pain
Open accessAbstract
Chronic pain poses significant challenges in the lives of many people. At the root of many of these challenges are the behavior patterns pain naturally coordinates. For example, in some cases, attempts to control, reduce, or cure pain through medication, medical procedures, or lifestyle changes can prove unsuccessful, and can dominate all other potential goals. The experience of chronic pain also includes other discouraging, painful, or unwanted psychological experiences, such as thoughts, feelings, and memories. Attempts to control or reduce some of these psychological experiences also can prove unsuccessful and even harmful, further reducing quality of life. This review highlights recent evidence for the utility of acceptance as an alternative when control-based methods are unsuccessful. It describes evidence from experimental, clinical, and treatment outcome studies. The review also notes how work in this area is drawing attention to the wider concept of "psychological flexibility," an overarching process that includes other component processes, such as mindfulness and values.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Improving acceptance is considered as more important than other coping strategies to achieve treatment success in chronic pain.
“improving acceptance is considered as more important than other coping strategies to achieve treatment success [59-64].”
From Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism. (2013) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Thompson, M., & McCracken, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McCracken, Lance M.
- Venue
- Current Pain and Headache Reports
- Published
- 2011-01-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-151
- ISSN
- 1531-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-3081
- OpenAlex
- W2064257401
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Pain and Headache Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- chronic pain, acceptance, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, values, pain coping, quality of life, treatment outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Behavior, Chronic Disease, Humans, Models, Psychological, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review