The neural circuitry of reward and its relevance to psychiatric disorders
Abstract
Scientific interest in how the brain processes reward has burgeoned during the past 50 years since the discovery that rats will do tasks such as pressing a lever to obtain electrical stimulation of the brain. This interest was additionally encouraged by the observation of an association between reward and dopamine activity in the mesocorticolimbic system. In this article, we will discuss the complex nature of reward processing and recent animal studies and human functional neuroimaging studies to elucidate the current understanding of the neural substrates of reward processing and its components. Lastly, we will review recent theoretical and empirical work investigating the role of brain reward circuitry in several psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorders, schizophrenia, pathologic gambling, major depressive disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reward information is processed via a limbic cortico-striatal-thalamic circuit that interdigitates with the mesolimbic DA pathway, and the NAc serves as a DA-gated mediator for information passing from the limbic system to the cortex.
“Reward information is processed via a limbic cortico-striatal-thalamic circuit that interdigitates with the mesolimbic DA pathway [56,57], and the NAc serves as a DA-gated mediator for information passing from the limbic system to the cortex [58].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Chau, D. T., Roth, R. M., & Green, A. I.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Venue
- Current Psychiatry Reports
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 391-399
- ISSN
- 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1645
- OpenAlex
- W1994576679
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- reward processing, neural circuits, dopamine, mesocorticolimbic system, mental illness, substance use disorders, schizophrenia, pathologic gambling, major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, functional neuroimaging
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Laboratory, Mental Disorders, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Receptors, Dopamine, Reward, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review