Cited by 47Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Impaired GABAergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia underlies impairments in cortical gamma band oscillations

Open access
McNally, James M., McCarley, Robert W., Brown, Ritchie E.·2013·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Impairment of cortical circuit function is increasingly believed to be central to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (Sz). Such impairments are suggested to result in abnormal gamma band oscillatory activity observed in Sz patients, and likely underlie the psychosis and cognitive deficits linked to this disease. Development of improved therapeutic strategies to enhance functional outcome of Sz patients is contingent upon a detailed understanding of the mechanisms behind cortical circuit development and maintenance. Convergent evidence from both Sz clinical and preclinical studies suggests impaired activity of a particular subclass of interneuron which expresses the calcium binding protein parvalbumin is central to the cortical circuit impairment observed. Here we review our current understanding of the Sz related cortical circuit dysfunction with a particular focus on the role of fast spiking parvalbumin interneurons in both normal cortical circuit activity and in NMDA receptor hypofunction models of the Sz disease state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-012-0346-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 47

Authors
McNally, J. M., McCarley, R. W., & Brown, R. E.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
McNally, James M.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2013-02-12
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
346-346
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2052612819
Cited by
47
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX001356)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH039683, MH040799, R21MH094803, R37MH039683, R01MH039683, R01MH040799, MH094803)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
schizophrenia, GABAergic neurotransmission, gamma oscillations, parvalbumin interneurons, fast-spiking interneurons, NMDA receptor hypofunction, cortical oscillations, psychosis, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Schizophrenia, GABAergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review