Cited by 56Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Psychosocial Interventions Targeting Social Functioning in Adults on the Autism Spectrum: a Literature Review

Open access
Pallathra, Ashley A., Cordero, Lucero, Wong, Kennedy, Brodkin, Edward S.·2019·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review There is a perceived shortage of evidence-based treatment programs for adults on the autism spectrum. This article reviews the recent research literature on psychosocial/behavioral interventions targeting social functioning in autistic adults without intellectual disability.Recent findings We identified only 41 peer-reviewed studies published from 1980 to 2017 that tested intervention programs focused on one or more of the behavioral components of social functioning (i.e., social motivation, social anxiety, social cognition, and social skills) in more than one adult with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The studies demonstrated substantial variability in treatment objectives, intervention procedures, assessment methods, and methodologic quality. The results indicate a strong need for additional research to develop and rigorously test interventions for autistic adults that target the many behavioral components of social functioning and that include procedures to promote generalization of knowledge and skills to community settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-019-0989-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both risperidone and aripiprazole are associated with adverse events including sedation, risk of movement disorders and weight gain, which limit their use to people with severe irritability with agitation.

    “However, both treatments are associated with adverse events, including sedation, risk of movement disorders and weight gain, which limit their use to people with severe irritability with agitation 202 .”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [202]

    The Results sections discuss psychosocial interventions and their methodological quality, not the adverse effects of risperidone or aripiprazole. Searches for both drugs, sedation, movement disorders, weight gain, and severe irritability with agitation found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Risperidone and aripiprazole are approved in the USA to treat irritability and agitation including aggression, self-injury and tantrums in children and adolescents with ASD.

    “Risperidone and aripiprazole (both of which are atypical antipsychotics) are approved in the USA to treat irritability and agitation -including aggression, self-injury and tantrums -in children and adolescents with ASD 200 -202 .”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [202]

    The Results and Conclusions discuss psychosocial interventions for social functioning in autistic adults, not medication approvals for children or adolescents. Searches for risperidone, aripiprazole, antipsychotics, and FDA approval found no passage addressing the claimed approval or indications. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [6]Hurlbutt K, Chalmers L. Adults with autism speak out: perceptions of their life experiences. Autism. 2002; 17(2): 103– 11.
  2. [7]Muller E, Schuler A, Burton BA, Yates GB. Meeting the vocational support needs of individuals with Asperger syndrome and other autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2003; 18(3): 163– 75.
  3. [24]Gersten R, Fuchs LS, Compton D, Coyne M, Greenwood C, Innocenti MS. Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children. 2005; 71(2): 149– 64.
  4. Cunningham A, Sperry L, Brady MP, Peluso PR, Pauletti RE. The Effects of a Romantic Relationship Treatment Option for Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation. 2017; 7(2): 99– 110.
  5. Howlin P, Yates P. The Potential Effectiveness of Social Skills Groups for Adults with Autism. Autism. 1999; 3(3): 299– 307.
  6. Fullerton A, Coyne P. Developing skills and concepts for self-determination in young adults with autism. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities. 1999; 14(1): 42– 52.
  7. Hillier A, Fish T, Cloppert P, Beversdorf DQ. Outcomes of a social and vocational skills support group for adolescents and young adults on the autism spectrum. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities. 2007; 22(2): 107– 15.
  8. Hillier A, Fish T, Siegel JH, Beversdorf DQ. Social and vocational skills training reduces self-reported anxiety and depression among young adults on the autism spectrum. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2011; 23: 267– 76.
  9. Koegel LK, Ashbaugh K, Koegel RL, Detar WJ. Increasing socialization in adults with asperger’s syndrome. Psychology in the Schools. 2013; 50(9): 899– 909.
  10. Koegel LK, Navab A, Ashbaugh K, Koegel RL. Using reframing to reduce negative statements in social conversation for adults With autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2015; 18(3): 133– 44.
  11. Lovett S, Rehfeldt RA. An evaluation of multiple exemplar instruction to teach perspective-taking skills to adolescents with asperger syndrome. Behavioral Development Bulletin. 2014; 19(2): 22– 36.
  12. Retherford KS, Schreiber LR. Camp campus: college preperation for adolescents and young adults with high-functioing autism, asperger syndrome, and other social communication disorders. Topics in Language Disorders. 2015; 35(4): 362– 85.
  13. Kiep M, Spek AA, Hoeben L. Mindfulness-based therapy in adults with an autism spectrum disorder: Do treatment effects last? Mindfulness. 2014; 6(3): 637– 44.

Authors
Pallathra, A. A., Cordero, L., Wong, K., & Brodkin, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Brodkin, Edward S.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2019-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
5-5
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2912577220
Cited by
56
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH104407)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, psychosocial interventions, social functioning, social motivation, social anxiety, social cognition, social skills, behavioral interventions, skill generalization, evidence-based treatment
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Social Behavior, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review