The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Der Zerlegungs-Ansatz – ein alternativer Vorschlag zur Messung von Armut
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results are very similar to the findings of Faik (2011) based on the EVS 2003.”
From Assessing differences in household needs: a comparison of approaches for the estimation of equivalence scales using German expenditure data (2021) · cites this paper as Faik (2011)
Citations
Cites
Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G., & Smeeding, T. M. (1988) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.1988.tb00564.x · Cited by 1,200
On the income dependence of equivalence scales
Koulovatianos, C., Schröder, C., & Schmidt, U. (2005) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.09.005 · Cited by 90
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J Public Econ 61:359–381 · DOI
- Coulter FAE, Cowell FA, Jenkins SP (1992) Equivalence scale relativities and the extent of inequality and poverty. Econ J (Lond) 102:1067–1082 · DOI
- Faik J (1995) Äquivalenzskalen. Theoretische Erörterung, empirische Herleitung und verteilungsbezogene Anwendung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin · DOI
- Foster JE, Greer J, Thorbecke E (1984) A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52:761–766 · DOI
- Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) Happiness & economics. How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Oxford · DOI
- Merz J, Faik J (1995) Equivalence scales based on revealed preference consumption expenditures – the case of Germany. Jahrb Natl Stat 214/4:425–447
- Missong M (2004) Demographisch gegliederte Nachfragesysteme und Äquivalenzskalen für Deutschland. Eine empirische Überprüfung neoklassischer Ansätze anhand der Daten der Einkommens- und Verbrauchsstichproben. Berlin · DOI
- Seidl C (1988) Poverty measurement: a survey. In: Bös D, Rose M, Seidl C (Hrsg) Welfare and efficiency in public economics. Heidelberg, Berlin, S 71–147 · DOI
- Schröder C (2004) Variable income equivalence scale. An empirical approach. Heidelberg/New York · DOI
- Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 57:348–368 · DOI
Cited by
Dudel, C., Garbuszus, J. M., & Schmied, J. (2021) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01822-6 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Faik, J.
- Corresponding author
- Faik, Jürgen
- Venue
- AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-315
- ISSN
- 1863-8155 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-8163
- OpenAlex
- W2170418889
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
- Keywords
- poverty measurement, decomposition method, poverty line, household size, equivalence scales, social groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Der Zerlegungs-Ansatz – ein alternativer Vorschlag zur Messung von Armut. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11943-010-0089-4
- The paper
- Faik, J. (2011). Der Zerlegungs-Ansatz – ein alternativer Vorschlag zur Messung von Armut. AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-010-0089-4
