The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modified Atmosphere Packaging Technology of Fresh and Fresh-cut Produce and the Microbial Consequences—A Review
Open accessAbstract
Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) technology offers the possibility to retard the respiration rate and extend the shelf life of fresh produce, and is increasingly used globally as value adding in the fresh and fresh-cut food industry. However, the outbreaks of foodborne diseases and emergence of resistant foodborne pathogens in MAP have heightened public interest on the effects of MAP technology on the survival and growth of pathogenic organisms. This paper critically reviews the effects of MAP on the microbiological safety of fresh or fresh-cut produce, including the role of innovative tools such as the use of pressurised inert/noble gases, predictive microbiology and intelligent packaging in the advancement of MAP safety. The integration of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points-based programs to ensure fresh food quality and microbial safety in packaging technology is highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Microbiology: Fundamentals And Frontiers
(2019) · doi:10.1128/9781555819972 · Cited by 3,579
A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food
Baranyi, J., & Roberts, T. A. (1994) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0 · Cited by 2,607
Jay, J. M. (1995) · Food Science Texts Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7476-7 · Cited by 2,396
Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review
Siracusa, V., Rocculi, P., Romani, S., & Rosa, M. D. (2008) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.003 · Cited by 2,126
Food Packaging—Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues
Marsh, K., & Bugusu, B. (2007) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x · Cited by 1,919
Crank, J., & Park, G. S. (1968) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 1,885
Biodegradable films and composite coatings: past, present and future
Tharanathan, R. N. (2003) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(02)00280-7 · Cited by 1,243
Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food
Lund, B. M., Baird-Parker, T. C., & Gould, G. W. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,144
Epidemic Profile of Shiga-Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany
Frank, C., Werber, D., Cramer, J. P., Askar, M., Faber, M., an der Heiden, M., Bernard, H., Fruth, A., Prager, R., Spode, A., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1106483 · Cited by 1,139
Morita, R. Y. (1975) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.39.2.144-167.1975 · Cited by 1,102
Cited by
Processing and Preservation of Fresh-Cut Fruit and Vegetable Products
Jideani, A. I. O., Anyasi, T. A., Mchau, G. R. A., Udoro, E. O., & Onipe, O. O. (2017) · Postharvest Handling · doi:10.5772/intechopen.69763 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Caleb, O. J., Mahajan, P. V., Al-Said, F. A.-J., & Opara, U. L.
- Venue
- Food and Bioprocess Technology
- Published
- 2012-07-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 303-329
- ISSN
- 1935-5130 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5149
- OpenAlex
- W2149370315
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 161
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modified Atmosphere Packaging Technology of Fresh and Fresh-cut Produce and the Microbial Consequences—A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4
- The paper
- Caleb, O. J., Mahajan, P. V., Al-Said, F. A.-J., & Opara, U. L. (2013). Modified Atmosphere Packaging Technology of Fresh and Fresh-cut Produce and the Microbial Consequences—A Review. Food and Bioprocess Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
