A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accountability and credit are two sides of the same coin, and contributors cannot have one without the other.
“Accountability and credit are two sides of the same coin, and contributors cannot have one without the other (Hosseini et al., 2022; Resnik, 1997; Smith, 2017).”
From The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023) · cites this paper as Resnik, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts
Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161231180449 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationResponsible Conduct of Research
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197547090.001.0001 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Resnik, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- Resnik, David B.
- ORCID
- Resnik, David B.
- Venue
- Science and Engineering Ethics
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-243
- ISSN
- 1353-3452 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5546
- OpenAlex
- W2056919159
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Science and Engineering Ethics (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- credit allocation, authorship practices, research team roles, scholarly publishing, research ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
