In Brief: Statistics in Brief: Confidence Intervals: What is the Real Result in the Target Population?
Open accessAbstract
Background Authors of a recent article [1] indicated there was a difference (p = 0.015) in compliance at 6 months between the percentage of patients with osteoarthritis receiving insoles (71%; 32 of 45) versus the patients receiving braces (45%; 21 of 46). The small p value along with randomization of the patients provided strong evidence that the percent compliance in the target population (ie, all patients with osteoarthritis being treated by these methods) really is different. However, the p value alone does not provide us with much information concerning the magnitude of the difference in compliance in the target population. For that, we need to consider the estimated difference of 26% (71%-45%) and appropriate confidence interval. Question What is a confidence interval and how should it be used? Discussion The confidence interval provides us with a range of values that we believe, with a given level of confidence, contains the true value of the statistical parameter (difference of percentages in this case) in the target population. The estimated parameter value of 26% difference in this small sample is the best point estimate we can make. However, we can be fairly certain this point estimate is not equal to the targeted true value as a very small sample rarely would give the exact estimate of the true proportion in the target population. Thus an interval estimate is needed to show the reliability of this point estimate. This is given by a confidence interval. To form a c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Small sample sizes and a limited number of trials contributed to heterogeneity.
“Small sample sizes and limited number of trials contributed to heterogeneity,57”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lam, A. C., Liddle, L. J., & MacLellan, C. L. (2023) · Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation · doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100242 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dorey, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dorey, Frederick J.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 468
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3137-3138
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2947664
- OpenAlex
- W2140619431
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- confidence intervals, statistical significance, p-value interpretation, medication adherence, osteoarthritis, insoles, braces, point estimates, standard errors, interval estimation, sample size, Gaussian approximation
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Patient Compliance, Confidence Intervals, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review