Defining Gender Disparities in Pain Management
Open accessAbstract
Background Prevalence rates of most musculoskeletal pain conditions are higher among women than men. Reasons for these prevalence disparities likely include sex differences in basic pain mechanisms and gender differences in psychosocial factors. Questions/purposes The purposes of this review were to (1) identify reasons for differences in pain prevalence between men and women, (2) assess whether musculoskeletal pain conditions are differently treated in men and women, and (3) identify reasons for sex/gender disparities in pain treatment. Methods A MEDLINE search was conducted using the terms "pain" or "musculoskeletal pain" and "gender differences" or "sex differences" with "health care," "health services," and "physician, attitude." Articles judged relevant were selected for inclusion. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Higher pain prevalence in women is consistently observed but not well understood. The relative contributions of sex differences in pain mechanisms and gender differences in psychosocial factors (eg, coping, social roles) to explaining differences in prevalence are not yet clear. Gender disparities in the amount of healthcare use for pain may be partially explained by the experience of higher-intensity pain in women. Pain intensity also seems to be a major factor influencing treatment, especially the prescription of medications for acute pain. However, clinicians' gender stereotypes, as well as the clinician's own gender, appear to influence diagnostic and treatment decisions…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences in the experience of pain between women and men are extensive and include severity and intensity of reported pain, pain sensitivity, prevalence of chronic pain, pain associated to distress and anxiety, and pain-induced hyperalgesia.
“Differences in the experience of pain between women and men are extensive and include severity and intensity of reported pain, pain sensitivity, prevalence of CP, pain associated to distress and anxiety, and pain-induced hyperalgesia.67–69”
From <p>Pain and Evil: From Local Nociception to Misery Following Social Harm</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- LeResche, L.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- LeResche, Linda
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 469
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1871-1877
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3111774
- OpenAlex
- W2055249986
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 11.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- gender disparities, musculoskeletal pain, sex differences, pain prevalence, pain management, pain intensity, psychosocial factors, gender stereotypes, clinician attitudes, health care utilization, chronic pain
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Men, Pain, Physicians, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Stereotyping, Women, Prevalence, Women's Health, Pain Threshold, Healthcare Disparities, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review