Cited by 48Enzyme Production and CharacterizationFungal and yeast genetics researchEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

Protease production by different thermophilic fungi

Macchione, Mariana M., Merheb, Carolina W., Gomes, Eleni, da Silva, Roberto·2008·Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Abstract

A comparative study was carried out to evaluate protease production in solid-state fermentation (SSF) and submerged fermentation (SmF) by nine different thermophilic fungi--Thermoascus aurantiacus Miehe, Thermomyces lanuginosus, T. lanuginosus TO.03, Aspergillus flavus 1.2, Aspergillus sp. 13.33, Aspergillus sp. 13.34, Aspergillus sp. 13.35, Rhizomucor pusillus 13.36 and Rhizomucor sp. 13.37--using substrates containing proteins to induce enzyme secretion. Soybean extract (soybean milk), soybean flour, milk powder, rice, and wheat bran were tested. The most satisfactory results were obtained when using wheat bran in SSF. The fungi that stood out in SSF were T. lanuginosus, T. lanuginosus TO.03, Aspergillus sp. 13.34, Aspergillus sp. 13.35, and Rhizomucor sp. 13.37, and those in SmF were T. aurantiacus, T. lanuginosus TO.03, and 13.37. In both fermentation systems, A. flavus 1.2 and R. pusillus 13.36 presented the lowest levels of proteolytic activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12010-007-8034-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 48

Authors
Macchione, M. M., Merheb, C. W., Gomes, E., & da Silva, R.
Affiliations
Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, câmpus de São José do Rio Preto (BR)
Venue
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Published
2007-10-12
Volume
146
Issue
1-3
Pages
223-230
ISSN
  • 0273-2289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-0291
OpenAlex
W2048299491
Cited by
48
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
protease production, thermophilic fungi, solid-state fermentation, submerged fermentation, Thermoascus aurantiacus, Thermomyces lanuginosus, Aspergillus, Rhizomucor pusillus, wheat bran substrate, soybean extract, milk powder, rice, protein substrates, enzyme secretion
MeSH terms
Mitosporic Fungi, Enzyme Activation, Enzyme Stability, Peptide Hydrolases, Species Specificity, Substrate Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review