CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of Calcium Alginate–Starch Entrapped Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia) Peroxidase for the Removal of Colored Compounds from a Textile Effluent in Batch as well as in Continuous Reactor

Matto, Mahreen, Satar, Rukhsana, Husain, Qayyum·2009·Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
DOI 10.1007/s12010-008-8396-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Calcium alginate-starch entrapped bitter gourd peroxidase has been employed for the treatment of a textile industrial effluent in batch as well as in continuous reactor. The textile effluent was recalcitrant to decolorization by bitter gourd peroxidase; thus, its decolorization was examined in the presence of a redox mediator, 1.0 mM 1-hydroxybenzotriazole. Immobilized enzyme exhibited same pH and temperature optima for effluent decolorization as attained by soluble enzyme. Immobilized enzyme could effectively remove more than 70% of effluent color in a stirred batch process after 3 h of incubation. Entrapped bitter gourd peroxidase retained 59% effluent decolorization reusability even after its tenth repeated use. The two-reactor system containing calcium alginate-starch entrapped enzyme retained more than 50% textile effluent decolorization efficiency even after 2 months of its operation. The absorption spectra of the treated effluent exhibited a marked difference in the absorption at various wavelengths as compared to untreated effluent. The use of a two-reactor system containing immobilized enzyme and an adsorbent will be significantly successful for treating industrial effluents at large scale, and it will help in getting water free from aromatic pollutants.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12010-008-8396-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Zouari-Mechichi, H., Mechichi, T., Dhouib, A., Sayadi, S., Mart’ınez, T. A., & Mart’ınez, J. A. (2006). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 39, 141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.11.027 . · DOI
  2. Papic, S., Koprivanac, N., Bozic, L. A., & Metes, A. (2004). Dye Pig, 62, 291–298. doi: 10.1016/S0143-7208(03)00148-7 . · DOI · Paper page
  3. Husain, Q. (2006). Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 60, 201–221. doi: 10.1080/07388550600969936 . · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zille, A., Tzanov, T., Gubitz, G. M., & Cavaco-Paulo, A. (2003). Biotechnology Letters, 25, 1473–1477. doi: 10.1023/A:1025032323517 . · DOI
  5. Rojas-Melgarejo, F., & Rodriguez-Lopez, N. J. (2004). Process Biochem, 39, 1455–1464. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00276-0 . · DOI
  6. Akhtar, S., Khan, A. A., & Husain, Q. (2005a). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 80, 198–205. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1179 . · DOI
  7. Husain, M., & Husain, Q. (2008). Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 1–41. doi: 10.1080/10643380701501213 . · DOI
  8. Lu, L., Zhao, M., & Wang, Y. (2007). World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 23, 159–166. doi: 10.1007/s11274-006-9205-6 . · DOI
  9. Akhtar, S., Khan, A. A., & Husain, Q. (2005b). Bioresource Technology, 96, 1804–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.004 . · DOI
  10. Jan, U., Khan, A. A., & Husain, Q. (2006). World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 22, 1033–1039. doi: 10.1007/s11274-005-3208-6 . · DOI
  11. Matto, M., & Husain, Q. (2006). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 81, 1316–1323. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1540 . · DOI
  12. Akhtar, S., Khan, A. A., & Husain, Q. (2005c). Chemosphere, 60, 291–301. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.017 . · DOI
  13. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. J. (1951). The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265–275. · DOI
  14. Ramsay, A. J., & Goode, C. (2004). Biotechnology Letters, 26, 197–201. doi: 10.1023/B:BILE.0000013711.32890.5d . · DOI
  15. Akhtar, S., & Husain, Q. (2006). Chemosphere, 65, 1228–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.049 . · DOI
  16. Soares, G. M., De Amorim, M. T., & Costa-Ferreira, M. (2001). Journal of Biotechnology, 89, 123–129. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00302-9 . · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fabbrini, M., Galli, C., & Gentili, P. (2002). Journal of Molecular Catalysis. B, Enzymatic, 16, 231–240. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(01)00067-4 . · DOI
  18. Li, K. C., Xu, F., & Eriksson, K. E. L. (1999). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 2654–2560. · DOI
  19. Kurniawati, S., & Nicell, A. J. (2007). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41, 353–361. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.03.003 . · DOI
  20. Kulshrestha, Y., & Husain, Q. (2007). Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 89, 255–267. doi: 10.1080/02772240601081692 . · DOI
  21. Mohan, S. V., Prasad, K. K., Rao, N. C., & Sarma, P. N. (2005). Chemosphere, 58, 1097–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.070 . · DOI
  22. Tonegawa, M., Dec, J., & Bollag, J. M. (2003). Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1222–1227. · DOI
  23. Azni, I., & Katayon, S. (2003). The Environmentalist, 23, 329–334. doi: 10.1023/B:ENVR.0000031411.87732.b1 . · DOI
  24. Tatsumi, K., Wada, S., & Ichikawa, H. (1996). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 51, 126–130. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960705)51:1<126::AID-BIT15>3.0.CO;2-O . · DOI
  25. Bhunia, A., Durani, S., & Wangikar, P. P. (2001). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 72, 562–567. doi: 10.1002/1097-0290(20010305)72:5<:562::AID-BIT1020>3.0.CO;2-S . · DOI
  26. Matto, M., & Husain, Q. (2007). Chemosphere, 69, 338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.069 . · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Matto, M., Satar, R., & Husain, Q.
Venue
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-11-18
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
512-523
ISSN
  • 0273-2289
  • 1559-0291
DOI
10.1007/s12010-008-8396-8
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review