Cited by 101Enzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationEnzyme Production and Characterizationbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fungal Hydrophobin RolA Enhanced PETase Hydrolysis of Polyethylene Terephthalate

Puspitasari, Nathania, Tsai, Shen-Long, Lee, Cheng-Kang·2021·Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Abstract

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) becomes one of the most well-known polyesters and is widely used as packaging material. Recently, polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase (PETase) has emerged as a potential biocatalyst demonstrating the ability to degrade polyethylene terephthalate (PET). We showed that the rate of PETase hydrolysis could be significantly increased in the presence of hydrophobin RolA. Hydrophobins represent a class of small fungal protein that has a high surface-active substance and can spontaneously self-assemble at hydrophilic-hydrophobic interfaces. In this work, a class I hydrophobin named RolA was extracted from the mycelium pellet collected from a fermentation culture of Aspergillus oryzae. The SDS-PAGE analysis of the isolated RolA showed the presence of 11 kDa polypeptide. Recombinant PETase from Ideonella sakaiensis was also successfully expressed in Escherichia coli as a soluble protein with molecular weight approximately 30 kDa. The hydrophobin RolA could enhance the PET hydrolysis in the presence of the recombinant PETase. The hydrolysis of PET bottle by RolA-PETase achieved the highest weight loss of 26% in 4 days. It is speculated that the wetting effect of RolA acts on PET surface converts PET to become hydrophilic that leads PETase easier to contact and attack the surface. Graphical Abstract.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12010-020-03358-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. López, M. D. M. C., Pernas, A. I. A., López, M. J. A., Latorre, A. L., Vilariño, J. M. L., & Rodríguez, M. V. G. (2014). Assessing changes on poly(ethylene terephthalate) properties after recycling: mechanical recycling in laboratory versus postconsumer recycled material. Materials Chemistry and Physics., 147(3), 884–894. · DOI
  2. Awaja, F., & Pavel, D. (2005). Recycling of PET. European Polymer Journal., 41(7), 1453–1477. · DOI
  3. Schiraldi, D. A., Scheirs, J., & Long, T. E. (2003). Modern polyesters: chemistry and technology of polyesters and copolyesters (pp. 245–266). New York: Wiley.
  4. Balani, K., Verma, V., Agarwal, A., & Narayan, R. (2015). Biosurfaces: a materials science and engineering perspective (1st ed.p. 330). New York: Wiley.
  5. Al-Sabagh, A. M., Yehia, F. Z., Eshaq, G., Rabie, A. M., & ElMetwally, A. E. (2016). Greener routes for recycling of polyethylene terephthalate. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum., 25(1), 53–64. · DOI
  6. Ruvolo-Filho, A., & Curti, P. S. (2006). Chemical kinetic model and thermodynamic compensation effect of alkaline hydrolysis of waste poly(ethylene terephthalate) in nonaqueous ethylene glycol solution. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research., 45(24), 7985–7996. · DOI
  7. Oromiehie, A., & Mamizadeh, A. (2004). Recycling PET beverage bottles and improving properties. Polymer International., 53(6), 728–732. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Webb, H. K., Arnott, J., Crawford, R. J., & Ivanona, E. P. (2013). Plastic degradation and its environmental implications with special reference to poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer., 5(1), 1–18.
  9. Mueller, R. J., Kleeberg, I., & Deckwer, W. D. (2001). Biodegradation of polyesters containing aromatic constituents. Journal of Biotechnology., 86(2), 87–95. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zimmermann, W., & Billig, S. (2010). Enzymes for the biofunctionalization of poly(ethylene terephthalate). In G. Nyanhongo, W. Steiner, & G. Gubitz (Eds.), Biofunctionalization of polymer and their applications. Advanced in Biochemical Engineering / Biotechnology (pp. 97–120). Berlin: Springer.
  11. Wei, R., & Zimmermann, W. (2017). Biocatalysis as a green route for recycling the recalcitrant plastic polyethylene terephthalate. Microbial Biotechnololgy., 10(6), 1302–1307. · DOI
  12. Heumann, S., Eberl, A., Pobeheim, H., Liebminger, S., Fischer-Colbrie, G., Almansa, E., Cavaco-Paulo, A., & Guebitz, G. M. (2006). New model substrates for enzymes hydrolysing polyethylene terephthalate and polyamide fibres. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, 69(1-2), 89–99. · DOI
  13. Vertommen, M. A. M. E., Nierstrasz, V. A., van der Veer, M., & Warmoeskerken, M. M. C. G. (2005). Enzymatic surface modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Journal of Biotechnology., 120(4), 376–386. · DOI
  14. Nyyssola, A. (2015). Which properties of cutinases are important for applications? Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology., 99(12), 4931–4942. · DOI
  15. Herrero Acero, E., Ribitsch, D., Steinkellner, G., Gruber, K., Greimel, K., Eiteljoerg, I., Trotscha, E., Wei, R., Zimmermann, W., Zinn, M., Cavaco-Paulo, A., Freddi, G., Schwab, H., & Guebitz, G. (2011). Enzymatic surface hydrolysis of PET: effect of structural diversity on kinetic properties of cutinases from Thermobifida. Macromolecules., 44(12), 4632–4640. · DOI
  16. Silva, C. M., Carneiro, F., O’Neill, A., Fonseca, L. P., Cabral, J. S., Guebitz, G., et al. (2005). Cutinase—a new tool for biomodification of synthetic fibers. Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry., 43(11), 2448–2450. · DOI
  17. Mueller, R. J., Schrader, H., Profe, J., Dresler, K., & Deckwer, W. D. (2005). Enzymatic degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate): rapid hydrolyse using a hydrolase from T. fusca. Maromolecular Rapid Communications., 26(17), 1400–1405. · DOI
  18. Vries, O. M. D., Fekkes, M. P., Wosten, H. A. B., & Wessels, J. G. (1993). Insoluble hydrophobin complexes in the walls of Schizophyllum commune and other filamentous fungi. Archives of Microbiology., 159(4), 330–335. · DOI
  19. Linder, M. B., Szilvay, G. R., Nakari-Setälä, T., & Penttilä, M. E. (2005). Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiology Reviews., 29(5), 877–896. · DOI
  20. Kulkarni, S., Nene, S., & Joshi, K. (2017). Production of hydrophobins from fungi. Process Biochemistry., 61, 1–11. · DOI
  21. Armenante, A., Longobardi, S., Rea, I., Stefano, L. D., Giocondo, M., Silipo, A., Molinaro, A., & Giardina, P. (2010). The Pleurotus ostreatus hydrophobin Vmh2 and its interaction with glucans. Glycobiology., 20(5), 594–602. · DOI
  22. Ma, Y., Yao, M., Li, B., Ding, M., He, B., Chen, S., & Zhou, X. (2018). Enhanced poly(ethylene terephthalate) hydrolase activity by protein engineering. Engineering., 4(6), 888–893. · DOI
  23. Ribitsch, D., Herrero Acero, E., Przylucka, A., Zitzenbacher, S., Marold, A., Gamerith, C., Tscheließnig, R., Jungbauer, A., Rennhofer, H., Lichtenegger, H., Amenitsch, H., Bonazza, K., Kubicek, C. P., Druzhinina, I. S., & Guebitz, G. M. (2015). Enhanced cutinase-catalyzed hydrolysis of polyethylene by covalent fusion to hydrophobins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology., 81(11), 3586–3592. · DOI
  24. Lumsdon, S. O., Green, J., & Stieglitz, B. (2005). Adsorption of hydrophobin proteins at hydrophobic and hydrophilic interfaces. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces., 44(4), 172–178. · DOI
  25. Wösten, H. A., & de Vocht, M. L. (2000). Hydrophobins, the fungal coat unravelled. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta., 1469(2), 79–86. · DOI
  26. Yu, L., Zhang, B., Szilvay, G. R., Sun, R., Janis, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2008). Protein HGFI from the edible mushroom Grifola frondosa is a novel 8 kDa class I hydrophobin that forms rodlets in compressed monolayers. Microbiology., 154(6), 1677–1685. · DOI
  27. Austin, H. P., Allen, M. D., Donohoe, B. S., Rorrer, N. A., Kearns, F. L., Silveira, R. L., Pollard, B. C., Dominick, G., Duman, R., el Omari, K., Mykhaylyk, V., Wagner, A., Michener, W. E., Amore, A., Skaf, M. S., Crowley, M. F., Thorne, A. W., Johnson, C. W., Woodcock, H. L., McGeehan, J. E., & Beckham, G. T. (2018). Characterization and engineering of a plastic-degrading aromatic polyesterase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., 115(19), E4350–E4357. · DOI
  28. Wang, H., Li, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhang, S. (2009). Degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) using ionic liquids. Green Chemistry., 11(10), 1568–1575. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Puspitasari, N., Tsai, S.-L., & Lee, C.-K.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Lee, Cheng-Kang
Venue
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Published
2020-06-06
Volume
193
Issue
5
Pages
1284-1295
ISSN
  • 0273-2289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-0291
OpenAlex
W3033189558
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
polyethylene terephthalate, PETase, class I hydrophobins, PET hydrolysis, Aspergillus oryzae, Ideonella sakaiensis, surface wetting, polyester biodegradation, recombinant protein expression
MeSH terms
Aspergillus oryzae, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Escherichia coli, Fungal Proteins, Hydrolysis, Polyethylene Terephthalates, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review