Cited by 20Analytical chemistry methods developmentElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsRadioactive element chemistry and processing

Dispersed solidified fine droplets based on sonication of a low melting point deep eutectic solvent: A novel concept for fast and efficient determination of Cr(VI) in urine samples

Seidi, Shahram, Alavi, Leila, Jabbari, Ali·2019·Biological Trace Element Research

Abstract

Cr(VI) has carcinogenic effects, so determination of trace amount of chromium in human body such as urine has a great deal of importance. In this work, a novel microextraction method was developed based on solidification of dispersed fine droplets (SDFD) of a low melting point deep eutectic solvent (DES), produced with the aid of sonication, for fast and efficient determination of Cr(VI) in urine samples. Cr(VI) contents of the human urine samples were first complexed using 1,5-diphenylcarbazone at pH ≈ 2.0 and then extracted by the method. A cloudy solution was achieved by the sonication of a microliter volume of a new water-immiscible DES consisting of benzyltriphenylphosphonium bromide (BTPPB) and phenol. Low freezing point of DES makes it possible to use simple, precise, and fast collection of the extraction phase by solidification and the subsequent centrifugation. Finally, the sedimented phase was diluted with methanol and analyzed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS). The influences of the main factors on the efficiency of the procedure were investigated by a four-factor central composite design (CCD). Under the optimum conditions, the calibration curve was linear within the range of 10-1000 ng L-1. The intra- and inter-day RSD% values of 2.6 and 4.7% were obtained at the concentration of 50.0 ng L-1, respectively. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated as 2.0 and 7.0 ng L-1, respectively. Moreover, compared to the other approaches, the proposed method presented better or comparable analytical performance and provided accurate, precise, and reliable results for trace analysis of Cr(VI) in urine samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12011-018-1438-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 20

Authors
Seidi, S., Alavi, L., & Jabbari, A.
Affiliations
K. N. Toosi University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Seidi, Shahram
Venue
Biological Trace Element Research
Published
2018-07-24
Volume
188
Issue
2
Pages
353-362
ISSN
  • 0163-4984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-0720
OpenAlex
W2883085414
Cited by
20
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Trace Element Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI) determination, urine samples, deep eutectic solvents, sonication, phenols, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, trace analysis
MeSH terms
Chromium, Humans, Iran, Research Design, Solvents, Sonication, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Time Factors, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Occupational Exposure, Limit of Detection, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review