The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in routine clinical practice
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) on computed tomography (CT) in the general population has been reported to be as high as 4.2%. However, many of the previous studies in this field utilised a prospective approach with analysis of CT scans performed by one or more radiologists with a specialist interest in adrenal tumours and a specific focus on identifying the presence of an adrenal mass. A typical radiology department, with a focus on the patient's presenting complaint as opposed to the adrenal gland, may not be expected to diagnose as many adrenal incidentalomas as would be identified in a dedicated research protocol. We hypothesised that the number of AI reported in routine clinical practice is significantly lower than the published figures would suggest. We retrospectively reviewed the reports of all CT thorax and abdomen scans performed in our hospital over a 2 year period. 3,099 patients underwent imaging, with 3,705 scans performed. The median age was 63 years (range 18-98). Thirty-seven true AI were diagnosed during the time period studied. Twenty-two were diagnosed by CT abdomen (22/2,227) and 12 by CT thorax (12/1,478), a prevalence of 0.98 and 0.81% with CT abdomen and thorax, respectively, for AI in routine clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The higher prevalence in Song et al. may be because the study protocol included a dedicated radiological review of adrenal imaging in a significant percentage of cases, possibly resulting in diagnosis of more AI than in routine practice.
“However, the study protocol included a dedicated radiological review of adrenal imaging in a significant percentage of cases, thereby possibly resulting in the diagnosis of more AI than would have been encountered in routine radiological clinical practice (44,45).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Over the last 2 decades, there has been a dramatic increase in the detection of AIs; series with contemporary high-resolution CT techniques report a prevalence close to that observed at autopsy.
“Over the last 2 decades, there has been a dramatic increase in the detection of AIs; series with contemporary high-resolution CT techniques report a prevalence close to that observed at autopsy (Table 2 (36-44)).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Davenport, C., Liew, A., Doherty, B., Win, H. H. N., Misran, H., Hanna, S., Kealy, D., Al-Nooh, F., Agha, A., Thompson, C. J., Lee, M., & Smith, D.
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Davenport, Colin
- Venue
- Endocrine
- Published
- 2011-03-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-83
- ISSN
- 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
- 1355-008X
- 1559-0100
- OpenAlex
- W2084653551
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Endocrine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac tumors and thrombi
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- adrenal incidentaloma, prevalence, routine clinical practice, computed tomography, adrenal mass, chest CT, abdominal CT, diagnostic yield, general population
- MeSH terms
- Adenoma, Adolescent, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Ireland, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radiography, Abdominal, Retrospective Studies, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Prevalence, Incidental Findings, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review