Comparison of a very low-calorie-ketogenic diet with a standard low-calorie diet in the treatment of obesity
Open accessAbstract
The global prevalence of obesity has significantly increased in most industrialized countries. Anti-obesity drugs are scarce, and indications to change their life style are impractical. Therefore, to identify diets able to produce significantly and maintained weight loss is mandatory. The present work evaluated the efficacy of a very low-calorie-ketogenic (VLCK) diet in obesity. A group of obese patients were randomized into two groups: the VLCK diet group and a standard low-calorie diet (LC group). The follow-up period was 12 months. Both groups received external support, counseling, to perform physical activity and adhered to the diet. The VLCK diet induced a 30-45 days of mild ketosis and significant effects on body weight within 15 days. At 2 months, the weight reductions in the VLCK diet and LC diet groups were 13.6 ± 3.9 and 4.8 ± 2.7 kg, respectively (p < 0.0001). At the end of the study, at 12 months, the weight reductions were 19.9 ± 12.3 and 7.0 ± 5.6 kg, respectively (p < 0.0001), and more than 88 % of patients in the VLCK diet group lost more of 10 % of their initial weight. Lean mass was practically unaffected. The VLCK diet was well tolerated and the side effects were moderate and transitory. In a group of obese patients, the VLCK diet was significantly more effective than a standard LC diet. At one year follow-up in the group with VLCK diet, most of the patients loss more than 10 % of their initial weight and lean mass was well preserved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our results are consistent with other adult ketogenic dietary studies that reported no bone mass loss in short-term or long-term follow-up of 2 and 5 years.
“Our results are consistent with other adult ketogenic dietary studies that reported no bone mass loss in short-term (66) or long-term follow-up of 2 (67, 82) and 5 (83) years.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Moreno, B., Bellido, D., Sajoux, I., Goday, A., Saavedra, D., Crujeiras, A. B., & Casanueva, F. F.
- Affiliations
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (ES)
- PronoKal Group (Spain) (ES)
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES)
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Casanueva, Felipe F.
- Venue
- Endocrine
- Published
- 2014-03-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 793-805
- ISSN
- 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
- 1355-008X
- 1559-0100
- OpenAlex
- W2030329099
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Endocrine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RUNA. Repositorio Institucional del Sergas (Servicio Gallego de Salud (SERGAS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Keywords
- very low-calorie ketogenic diet, hypocaloric diet, obesity, weight loss, ketosis, lean mass preservation, dietary adherence, physical activity counseling, long-term weight maintenance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Treatment Outcome, Caloric Restriction, Diet, Ketogenic, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review