Association between serum osteocalcin and body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose Osteocalcin is considered as a bone-derived hormone affecting on the body fat distribution and body mass index. Several cross-sectional studies have investigated the association between serum osteocalcin and body mass index. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the relationship between serum osteocalcin and body mass index.Methods We conducted a complete search up to November 2016 in PubMed and SCOPUS and reviewed reference list of all relevant articles and reviews. The DerSimonian-Laird method were used to pool effect sizes of eligible studies. The potential sources of heterogeneity were assessed using the standard χ 2 test.To find possible the sources of between-study heterogeneity, we carried out subgroup analyses based on sex, and type of study population.Results There was a significant inverse association in the overall result of this study between serum osteocalcin levels and BMI(r = -0.161; 95% CI: -0.197, -0.124, p < 0.000). In the subgroup analysis to find the sources of significant heterogeneity between-study, we observed that the type of the study population may be the source of between-study heterogeneity and the most correlation was seen in metabolic syndrome studies (r = -0.265; p = 0.000).Conclusion Findings from the available data indicated an overall significant inverse association between serum osteocalcin and body mass index. Further studies based on the type of study population are needed to better clarify these associations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meta-analyses of clinical studies showed inverse correlations between OCN levels and BMI, insulin resistance, the inflammatory marker CRP, body fat mass, and specifically, visceral fat mass, determined with radiologic imaging studies.
“Meta-analyses of clinical studies showed inverse correlations between OCN levels and BMI [202], insulin resistance [203], the inflammatory marker CRP [204], body fat mass [205], and specifically, visceral fat mass, determined with radiologic imaging studies [206,207,208].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Kord-Varkaneh, H., Djafarian, K., khorshidi, M., & Shab-Bidar, S.
- Affiliations
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Venue
- Endocrine
- Published
- 2017-08-18
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-32
- ISSN
- 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
- 1355-008X
- 1559-0100
- OpenAlex
- W2748794250
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- osteocalcin, body mass index, obesity, body fat distribution, metabolic syndrome, serum biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Obesity, Osteocalcin, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review