Cited by 357Long-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesInfectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis

Neurological Involvement in COVID-19 and Potential Mechanisms: A Review

Open access
Aghagoli, Ghazal, Gallo Marin, Benjamin, Katchur, Nicole J., Chaves-Sell, Franz, Asaad, Wael F., Murphy, Sarah A.·2021·Neurocritical Care

Abstract

As the current understanding of COVID-19 continues to evolve, a synthesis of the literature on the neurological impact of this novel virus may help inform clinical management and highlight potentially important avenues of investigation. Additionally, understanding the potential mechanisms of neurologic injury may guide efforts to better detect and ameliorate these complications. In this review, we synthesize a range of clinical observations and initial case series describing potential neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 and place these observations in the context of coronavirus neuro-pathophysiology as it may relate to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reported nervous system manifestations range from anosmia and ageusia, to cerebral hemorrhage and infarction. While the volume of COVID-19-related case studies continues to grow, previous work examining related viruses suggests potential mechanisms through which the novel coronavirus may impact the CNS and result in neurological complications. Namely, animal studies examining the SARS-CoV have implicated the angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2 receptor as a mediator of coronavirus-related neuronal damage and have shown that SARS-CoV can infect cerebrovascular endothelium and brain parenchyma, the latter predominantly in the medial temporal lobe, resulting in apoptosis and necrosis. Human postmortem brain studies indicate that human coronavirus variants and SARS-CoV can infect neurons and glia, implying SARS-CoV-2 may have similar neurovirulence. Additionally, studies have demonstrated an increase in cytokine serum levels as a result of SARS-CoV infection, consistent with the notion that cytokine overproduction and toxicity may be a relevant potential mechanism of neurologic injury, paralleling a known pathway of pulmonary injury. We also discuss evidence that suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may be a vasculotropic and neurotropic virus. Early reports suggest COVID-19 may be associated with severe neurologic complications, and several plausible mechanisms exist to account for these observations. A heightened awareness of the potential for neurologic involvement and further investigation into the relevant pathophysiology will be necessary to understand and ultimately mitigate SARS-CoV-2-associated neurologic injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12028-020-01049-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanisms underlying viral pathogenesis in these conditions may include a direct viral effect or indirect mechanisms, such as inflammation, epigenetic changes, and hypercoagulable changes, that may impact brain structure and function in healthy or cognitively impaired individuals.

    “Mechanisms underlying viral pathogenesis in these conditions may include a direct viral effect or indirect mechanisms, such as inflammation, epigenetic changes, and hypercoagulable changes, that may impact on brain structure and function in healthy or in cognitively impaired individuals [6, 11–15].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 357

Authors
Aghagoli, G., Gallo Marin, B., Katchur, N. J., Chaves-Sell, F., Asaad, W. F., & Murphy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • International League Against Epilepsy (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Aghagoli, Ghazal
Venue
Neurocritical Care
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
1062-1071
ISSN
  • 1541-6933 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-0961
OpenAlex
W3042862995
Cited by
357
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 21
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurocritical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R25AI140490)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, neurological complications, anosmia, ageusia, cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, ACE2 receptor, neurotropism, cytokine storm, neuroinflammation, postmortem neuropathology, SARS-CoV
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Nervous System Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review